CVE-2020-37288

lowpriority · track · 15EPSS 0.003 · 28 %ileUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.35% (28th) EPSS
CVSS 3.7 · low
Is it mine?
1 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
1 sources
osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-28

Vyper from 0.1.0b10 before 0.2.3 generates incorrect code for a return statement inside a for loop in an internal function called two or more internal calls deep, producing an invalid jump destination (stack underflow). Affected contracts revert such calls unnecessarily, which in limited circumstances could enable denial of service against public contracts.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

6.3
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · low–medium · 1.7–6.3

v3.13.7lowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:Lprimary · disclosure@vulncheck.comexploitability 2.2 · impact 1.4
v4.06.3mediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · disclosure@vulncheck.com
v4.01.7lowCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Trackcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (1)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (1)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-vg88-3v92-rjx2Vyper: Return inside for loop more than 1 level deep2026-10-06ghsa · osvUS

    # VVE-2020-0002 Earlier today, we received a responsible disclosure of a potential issue from @michwill (developer of @curvefi) for Vyper users who use return statements inside for loops of nested internal calls. Returning inside a for loop causes an invalid jump dest, reverting the transaction unnecessarily. MWE: ```python @internal def _baz(): for i in range(1): return # Stack underflow happens here @internal def _bar(): self._baz() @external def foo(): self._bar() ``` ### Impact Impact is minor, it is unlikely a user would encounter this problem unless they were working with nested calls, and return statements inside calls. Even in that scenario, you would encounter a revert which should be noticeable with adequate testing. In limited circumstances, this could cause a DoS attack for public contracts under certain conditions. ### Patches Fixed in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2110. Please upgrade to [Vyper 0.2.3](https://pypi.org/project/vyper/) ### Workarounds Not returning inside a for loop nested 2+ internal calls deep works as is: ```python @internal def _baz(): for i in range(1): pass return # This works fine @internal def _bar(): self._baz() @external def foo(): self._bar() ``` ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Chat with us in [our gitter ](https://gitter.im/vyperlang/community) * Open an issue in [https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper](https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper) * Email us at [security@vyperlang.org](mailto:security@vyperlang.org)

06

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-10-21modified 2026-10-22
07

references (2) nvd

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan