CVE-2019-17569

mediumpriority · track · 22EPSS 0.089 · 95 %ileDEEURUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
8.87% (95th) EPSS
CVSS 5.8 · medium
Is it mine?
91 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
5 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · fstec_bdu · cert_bund

EPSS · scored 2026-10-22

The refactoring present in Apache Tomcat 9.0.28 to 9.0.30, 8.5.48 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.98 to 7.0.99 introduced a regression. The result of the regression was that invalid Transfer-Encoding headers were incorrectly processed leading to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

5.8
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v2.05.8mediumAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 8.6 · impact 4.9
v3.14.8mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 2.2 · impact 2.5
v3.14.8mediumAV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Nsecondary · FSTEC (BDU) RU
v3.14.8mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.14.4mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

03

affected products (91)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

showing 20 of 91
04

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • WID-SEC-W-2023-2130Apache Tomcat: Mehrere SchwachstellenDeutsch2020-02-25csaf · cert_bundDE

    Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Apache Tomcat ausnutzen, um Dateien zu manipulieren und Informationen offenzulegen.

  • GHSA-767j-jfh2-jvrcPotential HTTP request smuggling in Apache Tomcat2020-02-28ghsa · osvUS

    The refactoring present in Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.28 to 9.0.30, 8.5.48 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.98 to 7.0.99 introduced a regression. The result of the regression was that invalid Transfer-Encoding headers were incorrectly processed leading to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely.

05

also known as (5)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

06

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

08

references (54)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan