CVE-2019-10300

lowpriority · track · 32EPSS 0.013 · 71 %ileEUUS

grimoire priorityP3 · Track

Exploitable?

—

no known exploitation

Likely / severe?

1.33% (71st) EPSS

CVSS 3.5 · low

Is it mine?

3 products

Check your exposure

Who says so?

4 sources

cnnvd · enisa_euvd · nvd · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins GitLab Plugin 1.5.11 and earlier in the GitLabConnectionConfig#doTestConnection form validation method allowed attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

8.0

010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · low–high · 3.5–8

v2.03.5lowAV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 6.8 · impact 2.9

v3.08highCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 2.1 · impact 5.9

v3.08highCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · OSV

v3.07.3highCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

CWE-352USprimaryCWE-352US

affected products (3)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

Jenkins Project Jenkins GitLab Plugin≤ 1.5.11 and earlierenisa_euvdEU
jenkins gitlab≤ 1.5.11nvdUScpe:2.3:a:jenkins:gitlab:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Maven org.jenkins-ci.plugins:gitlab-plugin< 1.5.12osvUSpkg:maven/org.jenkins-ci.plugins/gitlab-plugin

advisories (1)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

GHSA-j365-62px-vjjvJenkins GitLab Plugin Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability2022-05-24ghsa · osvUS
Jenkins GitLab Plugin did not perform permission checks on a method implementing form validation. This allowed users with Overall/Read access to Jenkins to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. Additionally, this form validation method did not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. This form validation method now requires POST requests and Overall/Administer permissions.

also known as (3)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

cnnvd enisa_euvd nvd osv NVD CVE.org MITRE

published 2019-04-18modified 2026-06-17

related (10,361)

Related entries.

ID	severity	EPSS	exploitable	published
CVE-2025-62593US	high8.8OT critical	60.2% (99th)	KEV	2025-11-26
Ray is an AI compute engine. Prior to version 2.52.0, developers working with Ray as a development tool can be exploited via a critical RCE vulnerability exploitable via Firefox an…
CVE-2023-2533US	high8.8OT critical	28.8% (98th)	KEV	2023-06-20
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in PaperCut NG/MF, which, under specific conditions, could potentially enable an attacker to alter security se…
CVE-2020-10181US	critical9.8OT critical	14.9% (97th)	KEV	2020-03-11
goform/formEMR30 in Sumavision Enhanced Multimedia Router (EMR) 3.0.4.27 allows creation of arbitrary users with elevated privileges (administrator) on a device, as demonstrated by…
CVE-2016-6277US	high8.8OT critical	99.8% (100th)	KEV	2016-12-14
NETGEAR R6250 before 1.0.4.6.Beta, R6400 before 1.0.1.18.Beta, R6700 before 1.0.1.14.Beta, R6900, R7000 before 1.0.7.6.Beta, R7100LG before 1.0.0.28.Beta, R7300DST before 1.0.0.46.…
CVE-2016-3718US	medium5.5OT critical	75.6% (100th)	KEV	2016-05-05
The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted ima…

+10356 more

references (16)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan