CVE-2017-6379
mediumpriority · track · 30EPSS 0.008 · 56 %ileEUUSEPSS · scored 2026-10-26
Some administrative paths in Drupal 8.2.x before 8.2.7 did not include protection for CSRF. This would allow an attacker to disable some blocks on a site. This issue is mitigated by the fact that users would have to know the block ID.
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 5.1–7.5
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
affected products (10)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
advisories (1)
Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.
- GHSA-gxxq-fhc7-3jv9Drupal Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)2022-05-17ghsa · osvUS
Some administrative paths in Drupal 8.2.x before 8.2.7 did not include protection for CSRF. This would allow an attacker to disable some blocks on a site. This issue is mitigated by the fact that users would have to know the block ID.
also known as (3)
Other names and identifiers for this entity.
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
references (7)
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- https://www.drupal.org/SA-2017-001cnnvd
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96919enisa_euvd
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038058enisa_euvd
- https://www.drupal.org/SA-2017-001enisa_euvd
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96919nvd
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038058nvd
- https://www.drupal.org/SA-2017-001Release NotesThird Party Advisorynvd
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan