CVE-2016-2850
mediumpriority · track · 31EPSS 0.021 · 82 %ileEUUSgrimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
2.12% (82nd) EPSS
CVSS 5 · medium
Who says so?
3 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · nvd
EPSS · scored 2026-10-27
Botan 1.11.x before 1.11.29 does not enforce TLS policy for (1) signature algorithms and (2) ECC curves, which allows remote attackers to conduct downgrade attacks via unspecified vectors.
01
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
7.5
010
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 5–7.5
v3.07.5highCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 3.9 · impact 3.6
02
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
03
affected products (31)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
showing 20 of 31
04
also known as (3)
Other names and identifiers for this entity.
05
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
07
references (10)
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- http://botan.randombit.net/security.htmlcnnvd
- http://marc.info/?l=botan-devel&m=145852488622892&w=2cnnvd
- http://botan.randombit.net/security.htmlenisa_euvd
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183669.htmlenisa_euvd
- http://marc.info/?l=botan-devel&m=145852488622892&w=2enisa_euvd
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-23enisa_euvd
- http://botan.randombit.net/security.htmlVendor Advisorynvd
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183669.htmlnvd
scry
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan