CVE-2016-0755
mediumpriority · track · 32EPSS 0.091 · 95 %ileEURUUSEPSS · scored 2026-10-27
The ConnectionExists function in lib/url.c in libcurl before 7.47.0 does not properly re-use NTLM-authenticated proxy connections, which might allow remote attackers to authenticate as other users via a request, a similar issue to CVE-2014-0015.
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 5–7.3
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
affected products (13)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
advisories (1)
Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.
- CURL-CVE-2016-0755NTLM credentials not-checked for proxy connection reuse2016-01-27vendor · osvUS
libcurl reuses NTLM-authenticated proxy connections without properly making sure that the connection was authenticated with the same credentials as set for this transfer. libcurl maintains a pool of connections after a transfer has completed. The pool of connections is then gone through when a new transfer is requested and if there is a live connection available that can be reused, it is preferred instead of creating a new one. Since NTLM-based authentication is *connection oriented* instead of *request oriented* as other HTTP based authentication, it is important that only connections that have been authenticated with the correct username + password are reused. This was done properly for server connections already, but libcurl failed to do it properly for proxy connections using NTLM. A libcurl application can easily switch user credentials used for a proxy connection between two requests, and that subsequent transfer then MUST make libcurl use another connection. libcurl previously failed to do so. The effects of this flaw, is that the application could be reusing a proxy connection using the previously used credentials and thus it could be given to or prevented access from resources that it was not intended to. This problem is similar to [CVE-2014-0015](https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2014-0015.html), which was for direct server connections while this is for proxy connections.
also known as (6)
Other names and identifiers for this entity.
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
references (39)
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- http://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20160127A.htmlcnnvd
- http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3455cnnvd
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2882-1cnnvd
- http://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_20160127A.htmlenisa_euvd
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Sep/msg00006.htmlenisa_euvd
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-February/176546.htmlenisa_euvd
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-February/177342.htmlenisa_euvd
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-February/177383.htmlenisa_euvd
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan