T1611 Escape to Host
EnterpriseAdversaries may break out of a container or virtualized environment to gain access to the underlying host. This can allow an adversary access to other containerized or virtualized resources from the host level or to the host itself. In principle, containerized / virtualized resources should provide a clear separation of application functionality and be isolated from the host environment. There are multiple ways an adversary may escape from a container to a host environment. Examples include creating a container configured to mount the host’s filesystem using the bind parameter, which allows the adversary to drop payloads and execute control utilities such as cron on the host; utilizing a privileged container to run commands or load a malicious kernel module on the underlying host; or abusing system calls such as `unshare` and `keyctl` to escalate privileges and steal secrets. Additionally, an adversary may be able to exploit a compromised container with a mounted container management socket, such as `docker.sock`, to break out of the container via a Container Administration Command. Adversaries may also escape via Exploitation for Privilege Escalation, such as exploiting vulnerabilities in global symbolic links in order to access the root directory of a host machine. In ESXi environments, an adversary may exploit a vulnerability in order to escape from a virtual machine into the hypervisor. Gaining access to the host may provide the adversary with the opportunity to achieve follow-on objectives, such as establishing persistence, moving laterally within the environment, accessing other containers or virtual machines running on the host, or setting up a command and control channel on the host.
platforms
Platforms this applies to.
tactics
ATT&CK tactics this technique serves.
mitigations
ATT&CK mitigations that reduce this.
detected by (6)
Data components that detect this.
NIST CSF 2.0 — areas of relevance (Protect / Detect)
NIST CSF 2.0 areas this most relates to (evidence-ranked).
- PR.DSData Securitymoderate · backed by 9 of 19 mapped controls
- DE.CMContinuous Monitoringmoderate · backed by 7 of 19 mapped controls
- PR.PSPlatform Securitymoderate · backed by 6 of 19 mapped controls
Derived from MITRE CTID (Apache-2.0) and the NIST 800-53 ↔ CSF crosswalk (public domain). Indicative relevance along the Protect/Detect axis — not a compliance assessment or coverage claim.
mitigating controls (19)
Security controls that mitigate this.
known-exploited CVEs (3)
Related CVEs.
| ID | severity | exploitable | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-22226US | medium6.0OT critical | KEV | ||
VMware ESXi, Workstation, and Fusion contain an information disclosure vulnerability due to an out-of-bounds read in HGFS. A malicious actor with administrative privileges to a vir… | ||||
| CVE-2025-22225US | high8.2OT critical | KEV | ||
VMware ESXi contains an arbitrary write vulnerability. A malicious actor with privileges within the VMX process may trigger an arbitrary kernel write leading to an escape of the sa… | ||||
| CVE-2025-22224US | high8.2OT critical | KEV | ||
VMware ESXi, and Workstation contain a TOCTOU (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use) vulnerability that leads to an out-of-bounds write. A malicious actor with local administrative privileges… | ||||
attack patterns (1)
CAPEC attack patterns that exploit this.
groups (1)
Threat groups associated with this.
software (4)
Malware and tools associated with this.
Detected by (Sigma) (2)
Sigma detection rules related to this.
source
Where this definition is published.