T1221 Template Injection

Enterprise

Adversaries may create or modify references in user document templates to conceal malicious code or force authentication attempts. For example, Microsoft’s Office Open XML (OOXML) specification defines an XML-based format for Office documents (.docx, xlsx,.pptx) to replace older binary formats (.doc,.xls,.ppt). OOXML files are packed together ZIP archives compromised of various XML files, referred to as parts, containing properties that collectively define how a document is rendered. Properties within parts may reference shared public resources accessed via online URLs. For example, template properties may reference a file, serving as a pre-formatted document blueprint, that is fetched when the document is loaded. Adversaries may abuse these templates to initially conceal malicious code to be executed via user documents. Template references injected into a document may enable malicious payloads to be fetched and executed when the document is loaded. These documents can be delivered via other techniques such as Phishing and/or Taint Shared Content and may evade static detections since no typical indicators (VBA macro, script, etc.) are present until after the malicious payload is fetched. Examples have been seen in the wild where template injection was used to load malicious code containing an exploit. Adversaries may also modify the <code>*\template</code> control word within an.rtf file to similarly conceal then download malicious code. This legitimate control word value is intended to be a file destination of a template file resource that is retrieved and loaded when an.rtf file is opened. However, adversaries may alter the bytes of an existing.rtf file to insert a template control word field to include a URL resource of a malicious payload. This technique may also enable Forced Authentication by injecting a SMB/HTTPS (or other credential prompting) URL and triggering an authentication attempt.

01

platforms

Platforms this applies to.

Windows
02

tactics

ATT&CK tactics this technique serves.

03

mitigations

ATT&CK mitigations that reduce this.

04

detected by (2)

Data components that detect this.

05

NIST CSF 2.0 — areas of relevance (Protect / Detect)

NIST CSF 2.0 areas this most relates to (evidence-ranked).

Derived from MITRE CTID (Apache-2.0) and the NIST 800-53 ↔ CSF crosswalk (public domain). Indicative relevance along the Protect/Detect axis — not a compliance assessment or coverage claim.

07

known-exploited CVEs (3)

Related CVEs.

IDseverity exploitable
CVE-2024-23692UScritical9.8OT criticalKEV
Rejetto HTTP File Server, up to and including version 2.3m, is vulnerable to a template injection vulnerability. This vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to exe…
CVE-2023-22527UScritical9.8OT criticalKEV
A template injection vulnerability on older versions of Confluence Data Center and Server allows an unauthenticated attacker to achieve RCE on an affected instance. Customers using…
CVE-2022-22954UScritical9.8OT criticalKEV
VMware Workspace ONE Access and Identity Manager contain a remote code execution vulnerability due to server-side template injection. A malicious actor with network access can trig…
08

attack patterns (1)

CAPEC attack patterns that exploit this.

09

groups (8)

Threat groups associated with this.

10

software (2)

Malware and tools associated with this.

11

campaigns (2)

Campaigns that use this.

13

source

Where this definition is published.