T1070 Indicator Removal
EnterpriseAdversaries may selectively delete or modify artifacts generated to reduce indications of their presence and blend in with legitimate activity. Rather than broadly removing evidence, adversaries may target specific artifacts that appear anomalous or are likely to draw scrutiny, while leaving sufficient data intact to maintain the appearance of normal system behavior. Artifacts such as command histories, log entries, or file metadata may be altered in ways that align with expected user or system activity. Location, format, and type of artifact (such as command or login history) are often platform-specific, allowing adversaries to tailor modifications that minimize suspicion. These actions may not prevent detection entirely but can delay recognition of malicious activity or reduce the fidelity of alerts by making events appear benign or consistent with routine operations. Additionally, selectively removed or modified artifacts may still be recoverable through deeper forensic analysis, though their absence or alteration can complicate timeline reconstruction and attribution.
platforms
Platforms this applies to.
tactics
ATT&CK tactics this technique serves.
sub-techniques (8)
More specific entries beneath this one.
mitigations
ATT&CK mitigations that reduce this.
detected by (6)
Data components that detect this.
NIST CSF 2.0 — areas of relevance (Protect / Detect)
NIST CSF 2.0 areas this most relates to (evidence-ranked).
- PR.DSData Securitymoderate · backed by 8 of 20 mapped controls
- PR.AAIdentity Management, Authentication, and Access Controlmoderate · backed by 7 of 20 mapped controls
- DE.CMContinuous Monitoringmoderate · backed by 5 of 20 mapped controls
Derived from MITRE CTID (Apache-2.0) and the NIST 800-53 ↔ CSF crosswalk (public domain). Indicative relevance along the Protect/Detect axis — not a compliance assessment or coverage claim.
mitigating controls (20)
Security controls that mitigate this.
known-exploited CVEs (3)
Related CVEs.
| ID | severity | exploitable | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-1389US | high8.8OT critical | KEV | ||
TP-Link Archer AX21 (AX1800) firmware versions before 1.1.4 Build 20230219 contained a command injection vulnerability in the country form of the /cgi-bin/luci;stok=/locale endpoin… | ||||
| CVE-2022-41128US | —OT critical | KEV | ||
Windows Scripting Languages Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-45382US | critical9.8OT critical | KEV | ||
A Remote Command Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in all series H/W revisions D-link DIR-810L, DIR-820L/LW, DIR-826L, DIR-830L, and DIR-836L routers via the DDNS function in nc… | ||||
attack patterns (1)
CAPEC attack patterns that exploit this.
groups (4)
Threat groups associated with this.
software (27)
Malware and tools associated with this.
campaigns (2)
Campaigns that use this.
Detected by (Sigma) (20)
Sigma detection rules related to this.
source
Where this definition is published.