CVE-2026-98920

lowPriorität · verfolgen · 0EPSS 0.002 · 6. Perzentil
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.17% (6th) EPSS
CVSS 3.3 · low
Is it mine?
0 products
Prüfe deine Angriffsfläche
Who says so?
— sources

EPSS · bewertet 2026-10-27

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix missing alloc tagging of direct mempool allocations Commit 1d78d56c43ef ("netfs: Fix folio_queue ENOMEM in writeback by adding a mempool") added a mempool for the folio_queues and made the request, subrequest and folio_queue allocations distinguish between writeback and everything else. Writeback is part of memory reclaim and must not fail due to ENOMEM, so it allocates under GFP_NOFS through mempool_alloc(), which may dip into the pool's reserve and, if that runs empty, wait for elements to be returned. The GFP_KERNEL paths, which can return -ENOMEM to their callers, invoke the pool's ->alloc() callback directly instead. The direct call, however, skips the alloc_hooks() wrapper that the mempool_alloc() macro provides. The pool callbacks, mempool_alloc_slab() and mempool_kmalloc(), call kmem_cache_alloc_noprof() and kmalloc_noprof() and rely on current->alloc_tag having been set by the caller. With CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_DEBUG=y this leads to current->alloc_tag not set WARNING: ./include/linux/alloc_tag.h:161 at __alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook alloc_tag was not set WARNING: ./include/linux/alloc_tag.h:166 at __alloc_tagging_slab_free_hook at allocation and free time respectively, as reported when reading files on a CIFS mount. The allocations are also missing from /proc/allocinfo. Wrap the direct ->alloc() invocations in alloc_hooks() with a new mempool_alloc_noreserve() helper in include/linux/mempool.h, next to the other alloc_hooks()-wrapped macros such as mempool_alloc(). The GFP_KERNEL paths keep their failable allocation semantics, they just get tagged now.

01

cvss

Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.

3.3
010

Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen

v3.13.3lowCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:Lsecondary · grimoire (LLM-derived)LLM-abgeleitet
02

schwächen

Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.

CWE-467USLLM-abgeleitetCWE-704USLLM-abgeleitet
03

betroffene Produkte

Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.

Keine betroffenen Produkte erfasst.

04

quellen

Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.

veröffentlicht 2026-10-23geändert 2026-10-23
05

Referenzen (3) nvd

Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.

scry

Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.

Kostenloser Scan