CVE-2026-84377
mediumPriorität · verfolgen · 0EPSS 0.005 · 45. PerzentilUSEPSS · bewertet 2026-10-26
LiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. Prior to versions 1.88.6 and 1.96.2, any authenticated LiteLLM proxy user could redirect an outbound provider call to a destination the user controls and cause the proxy to send its configured provider credentials to that destination. Request validation in litellm/proxy/auth/auth_utils.py, litellm/proxy/common_request_processing.py, litellm/proxy/health_endpoints/_health_endpoints.py, litellm/proxy/image_endpoints/endpoints.py, and litellm/proxy/litellm_pre_call_utils.py used incomplete checks that did not cover every sensitive parameter or inspect equivalent values across nested request fields, path values, and bracket-notation form data. Routing and credential parameters including api_base, base_url, model_list, fallbacks, and litellm_credential_name could therefore be applied without clearing the operator's stored key, exposing upstream provider credentials and other configured secrets and permitting server-side requests to internal services reachable by the proxy. This issue is fixed in versions 1.88.6 and 1.96.2.
cvss
Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.
Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen
SSVC
Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.
schwächen
Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.
betroffene Produkte (9)
Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.
Advisories (2)
Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.
- GHSA-3cv6-jpf6-8222LiteLLM: Authenticated SSRF and provider-credential exfiltration via unvalidated request-body routing parameters2026-09-30ghsa · osvUS
### Impact Any authenticated LiteLLM proxy user could redirect an outbound provider call to a destination they control and cause the proxy to send its own configured provider credentials to that destination. The proxy's request-body validation was a denylist that did not cover every sensitive parameter and did not inspect parameters nested inside other request fields, so a caller could supply a routing or credential value that the proxy applied without clearing the operator's stored key. Any authenticated user could therefore exfiltrate the operator's upstream provider credentials and other configured secrets, and perform Server-Side Request Forgery against internal services reachable from the proxy. ### Patches Fixed in 1.96.2, 1.95.1, 1.94.3, 1.93.2, 1.92.2, 1.91.5, 1.90.7, 1.89.7, and 1.88.6. ### Workarounds Set `general_settings.allow_client_side_credentials` to `false` so callers cannot override connection parameters, restrict proxy keys to trusted callers, and block the affected parameters (`api_base`, `base_url`, `model_list`, `fallbacks`, provider credential fields) at a reverse proxy or API gateway.
- PYSEC-2026-4066LiteLLM: Authenticated SSRF and provider-credential exfiltration via unvalidated request-body routing parameters2026-10-01vendor · osvUS
### Impact Any authenticated LiteLLM proxy user could redirect an outbound provider call to a destination they control and cause the proxy to send its own configured provider credentials to that destination. The proxy's request-body validation was a denylist that did not cover every sensitive parameter and did not inspect parameters nested inside other request fields, so a caller could supply a routing or credential value that the proxy applied without clearing the operator's stored key. Any authenticated user could therefore exfiltrate the operator's upstream provider credentials and other configured secrets, and perform Server-Side Request Forgery against internal services reachable from the proxy. ### Patches Fixed in 1.96.2, 1.95.1, 1.94.3, 1.93.2, 1.92.2, 1.91.5, 1.90.7, 1.89.7, and 1.88.6. ### Workarounds Set `general_settings.allow_client_side_credentials` to `false` so callers cannot override connection parameters, restrict proxy keys to trusted callers, and block the affected parameters (`api_base`, `base_url`, `model_list`, `fallbacks`, provider credential fields) at a reverse proxy or API gateway.
auch bekannt als (2)
Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.
quellen
Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.
Referenzen (9) nvd
Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.
- https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/commit/473f72e63a9777d793fbbf57194d8ec4fb97bc1b
- https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/commit/820f247a6abba55cd87d130bef7bba7be3b29d37
- https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/commit/c898d341c02299cf2506d0d8e84cc67953043593
- https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/pull/36011
- https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/pull/36314
- https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/pull/36494
- https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/releases/tag/v1.88.6
- https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/releases/tag/v1.96.2
Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.
Kostenloser Scan