CVE-2026-78682

highPriorität · verfolgen · 30EPSS 0.004 · 38. PerzentilRUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.43% (38th) EPSS
CVSS 7.5 · high
Is it mine?
3 products
Prüfe deine Angriffsfläche
Who says so?
3 sources
fstec_bdu · osv · nvd

EPSS · bewertet 2026-10-28

NLTK before 3.10.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in nltk.pathsec.urlopen (and callers nltk.data.load, nltk.downloader.Downloader.index/download) when an HTTP proxy is configured. pathsec.urlopen validates the requested hostname locally, but proxy-handler inheritance disables the safe HTTP/HTTPS handlers so the actual fetch is performed by the proxy against a destination that is never re-validated. An attacker can supply a validated public URL that the proxy forwards to an internal loopback-only service, allowing disclosure of internal HTTP resources, loading of forged downloader indexes, and installation of attacker-chosen package content.

01

cvss

Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.

8.7
010

Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen⚠ Quellen uneinig · medium–high · 6.6–8.7

v3.17.5highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nprimary · disclosure@vulncheck.comAusnutzbarkeit 3.9 · Auswirkung 3.6
v3.17.5highAV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · FSTEC (BDU) RU
v4.08.7highCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · disclosure@vulncheck.com
v4.06.6mediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

SSVC

Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: yes · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

schwächen

Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.

04

betroffene Produkte (3)

Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.

05

Advisories (2)

Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.

  • GHSA-6ww7-3frv-cqxhNLTK: pathsec SSRF protection can be bypassed when a proxy is configured2026-09-08ghsa · osvUS

    ### Summary Current NLTK source reopens SSRF in proxied environments. `pathsec.urlopen()` validates the requested hostname locally, but once proxy inheritance is enabled the real fetch is performed by the proxy rather than by the validated direct-connect socket path. ### Details - **Vulnerability type:** Server-side request forgery - **Affected component:** `nltk.pathsec.urlopen`, `nltk.data.load`, `nltk.downloader.Downloader.index`, `nltk.downloader.Downloader.download` - **Affected versions:** Current source `v3.10.0-rc2`; published `3.9.4` was a negative control and did not reproduce. - **Patched versions:** Not yet patched - **Root cause:** Proxy-handler inheritance disables `_SafeHTTPHandler` and `_SafeHTTPSHandler`, so the validated hostname no longer matches the actual egress destination. The hardened direct path pins the validated numeric destination IP before opening the socket. The proxied branch instead copies `ProxyHandler` instances from the global opener, marks the request as proxied, and skips the pinned handlers. I confirmed that a validated public URL can be fetched from a loopback-only internal service through the proxy path via `pathsec.urlopen()`, `nltk.data.load()`, `Downloader.index()`, and `Downloader.download()`. ### PoC **Preconditions** - The runtime has an HTTP proxy configured and the caller relies on `pathsec` to keep network fetches SSRF-safe. **Steps** 1. Start a loopback-only HTTP server that serves secret text, a valid downloader index, and a ZIP payload. 2. Configure a proxy that forwards a validated public URL to that internal loopback service. 3. Call `pathsec.urlopen()` or `nltk.data.load()` on the public URL and observe the internal response is returned. 4. Instantiate `Downloader(server_index_url=...)`, call `index()` and `download()`, and observe internal-only content is parsed and installed. **Minimal reproducible excerpt** ```text {'urlopen': 'PROXY_TEXT_SECRET', 'data_load': 'PROXY_TEXT_SECRET', 'downloaded_file': 'INTERNAL_ZIP_SECRET'} ``` ### Impact Consumers that trust `pathsec` as an SSRF barrier in proxied environments can be made to read internal-only HTTP resources, load forged downloader indexes, and install attacker-chosen package content fetched from the proxy's network view. ### Remediation Preserve destination validation for the actual proxy egress target or fail closed when the request would otherwise downgrade into an unpinned proxied path. Add regression tests across `pathsec.urlopen`, `nltk.data.load`, and downloader fetches with a configured proxy. ### References - https://github.com/nltk/nltk/blob/v3.10.0-rc2/nltk/pathsec.py#L468-L518 - https://github.com/nltk/nltk/blob/v3.10.0-rc2/nltk/data.py#L1247-L1283 - https://github.com/nltk/nltk/blob/v3.10.0-rc2/nltk/downloader.py#L875-L889 - https://github.com/nltk/nltk/blob/v3.10.0-rc2/nltk/downloader.py#L1220-L1226 - https://github.com/nltk/nltk/blob/3.9.4/nltk/pathsec.py#L245-L250 --- ## Fix + attack demonstration (verified) NLTK cannot pin the egress through a proxy, so it stops pretending to: under `ENFORCE` a proxied fetch is **refused** rather than performed unvalidated. Operators who trust their proxy opt back in with `NLTK_ALLOW_PROXIED_URLOPEN=1` or `nltk.pathsec.ALLOW_PROXIED_FETCH=True`; under `ENFORCE=False` the refusal degrades to a warning. This closes the **whole class** (environment proxies and explicit `ProxyHandler` alike), because NLTK declines any fetch whose egress it cannot validate. ## Attack demonstration (reproduced; captured output) A loopback HTTP server stands in for the internal target; `http_proxy` points at it; NLTK is asked for a **public** IP URL. **Before the fix** — the internal secret is exfiltrated through the proxy: ``` validate_network_url(public): PASSED *** BYPASS: pathsec.urlopen returned INTERNAL content via proxy: 'INTERNAL_ONLY_SECRET' ``` **After the fix** — five scenarios, isolated subprocesses: | Scenario | Result | |---|---| | proxied (env) + ENFORCE | `PermissionError` — **blocked** | | proxied + opt-in | returns secret — escape hatch works | | explicit `ProxyHandler` (not env) + ENFORCE | `PermissionError` — **blocked** (whole class) | | no proxy (direct) | internal IP still refused — pinning intact | | proxied + `ENFORCE=False` | returns secret **+ warns** | ## Tests `nltk/test/unit/test_pathsec.py`: 64 passed. Added an end-to-end regression (`test_proxied_fetch_does_not_reach_internal_target`) plus `test_env_proxy_fails_closed_under_enforce`; the prior `test_env_proxy_skips_pinning_handlers` (which encoded the vulnerable path) is re-expressed as the opt-in case. Existing direct-path DNS-rebinding and IP-policy tests unchanged and passing. pre-commit (isort/black/ruff) clean. ## Note The upfront `validate_network_url()` and the direct-path IP pinning (from the earlier DNS-rebinding fixes, CVE-2026-54296 / GHSA-qvv7) are unchanged — this only closes the proxied downgrade they didn't cover.

  • PYSEC-2026-37332026-08-25vendor · osvUS

    NLTK before 3.10.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in nltk.pathsec.urlopen (and callers nltk.data.load, nltk.downloader.Downloader.index/download) when an HTTP proxy is configured. pathsec.urlopen validates the requested hostname locally, but proxy-handler inheritance disables the safe HTTP/HTTPS handlers so the actual fetch is performed by the proxy against a destination that is never re-validated. An attacker can supply a validated public URL that the proxy forwards to an internal loopback-only service, allowing disclosure of internal HTTP resources, loading of forged downloader indexes, and installation of attacker-chosen package content.

06

auch bekannt als (4)

Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.

07

quellen

Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.

veröffentlicht 2026-08-25geändert 2026-08-31
08

Referenzen (2) nvd

Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.

scry

Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.

Kostenloser Scan