CVE-2026-78680

highPriorität · verfolgen · 31EPSS 0.002 · 7. PerzentilRUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.18% (7th) EPSS
CVSS 7.8 · high
Is it mine?
2 products
Prüfe deine Angriffsfläche
Who says so?
2 sources
fstec_bdu · osv

EPSS · bewertet 2026-10-28

NLTK versions before 3.10.3 fail to use validated absolute paths when invoking the Graphviz dot binary in dependencygraph.dot2img and AlignedSent._repr_svg_, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code by placing a malicious dot binary in the search path or current working directory. Attackers can exploit bare-name binary resolution on Windows via the current working directory or on Unix-like systems via relative PATH entries to execute their binary instead of the legitimate Graphviz tool.

01

cvss

Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.

8.5
010

Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen⚠ Quellen uneinig · medium–high · 5.9–8.5

v3.17.8highCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hprimary · disclosure@vulncheck.comAusnutzbarkeit 1.8 · Auswirkung 5.9
v3.17.8highAV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · FSTEC (BDU) RU
v3.17.8highCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · OSV
v4.08.5highCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · disclosure@vulncheck.com
v4.05.9mediumCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

SSVC

Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: totalcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

schwächen

Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.

04

betroffene Produkte (2)

Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.

05

Advisories (2)

Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.

  • GHSA-6hwm-xvph-95vmNLTK: Uncontrolled search path when invoking the Graphviz 'dot' binary2026-09-01ghsa · osvUS

    Two NLTK sites executed the Graphviz `dot` program by bare name, so process creation resolved it via the search path — and on Windows via the current working directory — rather than a validated absolute location. An attacker who can place a file named `dot` where resolution looks (the CWD on Windows, or a writable/relative entry such as `.` on `PATH`) has their binary executed in place of Graphviz (arbitrary code execution). Affected (<= 3.10.2): - `nltk.parse.dependencygraph.dot2img` — called `find_binary("dot")` but discarded the returned validated path and then ran the bare name `["dot", ...]`, so the validation had no effect. - `nltk.translate.api.AlignedSent._repr_svg_` — ran the bare name with no validation at all (IPython SVG rendering). This is the same class already fixed for the senna, weka, boxer, malt, repp and hunpos wrappers. `nltk.internals.find_binary` refuses a CWD-relative match for a bare tool name and returns only a trusted absolute path; the fix runs that path in both sites. --- ## Attack demonstration Captured output, not illustrative. A `./dot` that writes a `PWNED` marker, planted in the CWD with `.` prepended to `PATH`. **The vulnerable behaviour (old bare-name exec):** ``` Control (OLD behavior) — bare ['dot'] in this dir with '.' on PATH: bare ['dot'] executed planted binary = True ``` **The patched functions refuse it:** ``` FIXED code, with ./dot planted and '.' on PATH: dependencygraph.dot2img : Exception "Cannot find the dot binary..." | planted-binary-executed=False safe AlignedSent._repr_svg_ : Exception "Cannot find the dot binary..." | planted-binary-executed=False safe ``` **And `find_binary` itself was attacked directly** (the fix trusts nothing else): ``` Attack 1: ./dot in CWD, no dot on PATH -> LookupError (refused) safe Attack 2: ./dot/dot (dir 'dot' holding 'dot') -> LookupError (refused) safe Attack 3: '.' on PATH + ./dot -> LookupError (refused) safe Attack 4: attacker-writable ABSOLUTE dir on PATH -> returned /…/evilbin/dot (absolute) ``` Attack 4 is out of scope: trusting an absolute directory that is already on `PATH` is the operating system's own trust model — an attacker who can write to a `PATH` directory owns the account regardless of NLTK. `find_binary` defends specifically against the CWD/relative injection that bare-name exec is vulnerable to (attacks 1–3), which is exactly what this fix inherits. Environment: python 3.13.7. `dot` is not required to reproduce — the planted binary is the payload.

  • PYSEC-2026-3868NLTK: Uncontrolled search path when invoking the Graphviz 'dot' binary2026-09-10vendor · osvUS

    Two NLTK sites executed the Graphviz `dot` program by bare name, so process creation resolved it via the search path — and on Windows via the current working directory — rather than a validated absolute location. An attacker who can place a file named `dot` where resolution looks (the CWD on Windows, or a writable/relative entry such as `.` on `PATH`) has their binary executed in place of Graphviz (arbitrary code execution). Affected (<= 3.10.2): - `nltk.parse.dependencygraph.dot2img` — called `find_binary("dot")` but discarded the returned validated path and then ran the bare name `["dot", ...]`, so the validation had no effect. - `nltk.translate.api.AlignedSent._repr_svg_` — ran the bare name with no validation at all (IPython SVG rendering). This is the same class already fixed for the senna, weka, boxer, malt, repp and hunpos wrappers. `nltk.internals.find_binary` refuses a CWD-relative match for a bare tool name and returns only a trusted absolute path; the fix runs that path in both sites. --- ## Attack demonstration Captured output, not illustrative. A `./dot` that writes a `PWNED` marker, planted in the CWD with `.` prepended to `PATH`. **The vulnerable behaviour (old bare-name exec):** ``` Control (OLD behavior) — bare ['dot'] in this dir with '.' on PATH: bare ['dot'] executed planted binary = True ``` **The patched functions refuse it:** ``` FIXED code, with ./dot planted and '.' on PATH: dependencygraph.dot2img : Exception "Cannot find the dot binary..." | planted-binary-executed=False safe AlignedSent._repr_svg_ : Exception "Cannot find the dot binary..." | planted-binary-executed=False safe ``` **And `find_binary` itself was attacked directly** (the fix trusts nothing else): ``` Attack 1: ./dot in CWD, no dot on PATH -> LookupError (refused) safe Attack 2: ./dot/dot (dir 'dot' holding 'dot') -> LookupError (refused) safe Attack 3: '.' on PATH + ./dot -> LookupError (refused) safe Attack 4: attacker-writable ABSOLUTE dir on PATH -> returned /…/evilbin/dot (absolute) ``` Attack 4 is out of scope: trusting an absolute directory that is already on `PATH` is the operating system's own trust model — an attacker who can write to a `PATH` directory owns the account regardless of NLTK. `find_binary` defends specifically against the CWD/relative injection that bare-name exec is vulnerable to (attacks 1–3), which is exactly what this fix inherits. Environment: python 3.13.7. `dot` is not required to reproduce — the planted binary is the payload.

06

auch bekannt als (3)

Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.

07

quellen

Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.

veröffentlicht 2026-08-25geändert 2026-09-23
08

Referenzen (2) nvd

Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.

scry

Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.

Kostenloser Scan