CVE-2026-70487

mediumPriorität · verfolgen · 26OT-Risiko · erhöhtEPSS 0.004 · 36. PerzentilEUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.42% (36th) EPSS
CVSS 6.5 · medium
Is it mine?
3 products
Prüfe deine Angriffsfläche
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv · nvd

EPSS · bewertet 2026-10-28

Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.8.8 until 0.11.0, inline direct model metadata accepted client-supplied knowledge attachments without filtering them against the caller's read access. Any authenticated user who knew another user's file id could have the builtin knowledge tools return indexed chunks from that file, causing a read-only cross-user confidentiality loss while leaving knowledge-base permissions and saved workspace model validation unaffected. This issue is fixed in 0.11.0.

01

cvss

Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.

6.5
010

Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen

v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USAusnutzbarkeit 2.8 · Auswirkung 3.6
v3.15.3mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.15.3mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comAusnutzbarkeit 1.6 · Auswirkung 3.6
v3.15.3mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.16mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

SSVC

Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.

Trackcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

schwächen

Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.

04

betroffene Produkte (3)

Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.

05

Advisories (2)

Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.

  • GHSA-6xhv-rxhv-pwm4Open WebUI: Cross-user file content disclosure via request-scoped direct model knowledge metadata2026-08-04ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary Open WebUI lets a client define a model inline on a chat request instead of selecting a saved workspace model. The knowledge attached to such an inline model was used as-is, without checking that the caller can read what it points at. Any authenticated user who knows another user's file id could therefore have the builtin knowledge tools return that file's indexed content back to them. ## Preconditions Authenticated user of any role, no admin rights needed. The request must carry a session id and use native function calling, which is the default (only `function_calling: legacy` opts out), and the model's `builtin_tools` capability must not be disabled (default enabled). The attacker must already know the target file's id; ids are UUIDs and are not enumerable through this path. No admin setting needs to be turned on: enabling Direct Connections is not required for the backend to accept an inline model. Knowledge bases attached this way were never affected, their own access grants were enforced on every path. ## Impact An authenticated user could read the indexed chunks of another user's or group's file, a cross-user confidentiality loss limited to files whose ids the attacker already holds. It is read-only: nothing is modified or deleted, knowledge-base permissions are unaffected, and saved workspace models were already validated at creation time. ## Fix Fixed in 0.11.0 by commit 305880f2e. An inline model's attached knowledge is filtered against the caller's real read access before it is used, dropping any file, knowledge base or note the caller cannot read. Upgrading fully resolves it, no configuration change is required. ## Root cause Affected component: the chat completion, chat completed and chat action endpoints, which accept an inline model definition, and the builtin knowledge tools that consume the model's attached knowledge. Affected setups: all builds from 0.8.8 through 0.10.2. Saved workspace models have their attached file references validated against the author when the model is created, updated or imported, so a stored model can only carry files its creator can read. An inline model never passes through that path, yet everything downstream treated its attached knowledge with the same trust, including a helper that grants read access to a file purely because the running model claims it as attached knowledge. The missing control was an access check at the point where client-supplied model metadata enters the request. ## Credits Reported by @whyiug.

  • PYSEC-2026-3643Open WebUI: Cross-user file content disclosure via request-scoped direct model knowledge metadata2026-08-10vendor · osvUS

    ## Summary Open WebUI lets a client define a model inline on a chat request instead of selecting a saved workspace model. The knowledge attached to such an inline model was used as-is, without checking that the caller can read what it points at. Any authenticated user who knows another user's file id could therefore have the builtin knowledge tools return that file's indexed content back to them. ## Preconditions Authenticated user of any role, no admin rights needed. The request must carry a session id and use native function calling, which is the default (only `function_calling: legacy` opts out), and the model's `builtin_tools` capability must not be disabled (default enabled). The attacker must already know the target file's id; ids are UUIDs and are not enumerable through this path. No admin setting needs to be turned on: enabling Direct Connections is not required for the backend to accept an inline model. Knowledge bases attached this way were never affected, their own access grants were enforced on every path. ## Impact An authenticated user could read the indexed chunks of another user's or group's file, a cross-user confidentiality loss limited to files whose ids the attacker already holds. It is read-only: nothing is modified or deleted, knowledge-base permissions are unaffected, and saved workspace models were already validated at creation time. ## Fix Fixed in 0.11.0 by commit 305880f2e. An inline model's attached knowledge is filtered against the caller's real read access before it is used, dropping any file, knowledge base or note the caller cannot read. Upgrading fully resolves it, no configuration change is required. ## Root cause Affected component: the chat completion, chat completed and chat action endpoints, which accept an inline model definition, and the builtin knowledge tools that consume the model's attached knowledge. Affected setups: all builds from 0.8.8 through 0.10.2. Saved workspace models have their attached file references validated against the author when the model is created, updated or imported, so a stored model can only carry files its creator can read. An inline model never passes through that path, yet everything downstream treated its attached knowledge with the same trust, including a helper that grants read access to a file purely because the running model claims it as attached knowledge. The missing control was an access check at the point where client-supplied model metadata enters the request. ## Credits Reported by @whyiug.

06

auch bekannt als (6)

Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.

07

quellen

Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.

veröffentlicht 2026-08-04geändert 2026-08-05
08

Referenzen (10)

Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.

scry

Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.

Kostenloser Scan