CVE-2026-54906

Oracle heeft 110 kwetsbaarheden verholpen in diverse Oracle Communications-producten, waaronder Oracle Communications Unified Assurance, Oracle Communications Cloud Native Core Security Edge Protection Proxy, Oracle Communications Service Catalog and Design en Oracle Communications Operations Monitor.

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Siebel CRM ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Communications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

### Summary `Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_write_lock` does not verify that the calling thread acquired the write lock. Any thread with access to the lock object can release an active write lock held by another thread. A second writer can then enter its critical section while the first writer is still running. `Concurrent::ReadWriteLock#release_read_lock` also decrements the shared counter even when no read lock is held. Calling it on a fresh lock changes the counter from `0` to `-1`, after which normal read acquisition raises `Concurrent::ResourceLimitError`. This is a synchronization correctness issue in the public `Concurrent::ReadWriteLock` API. It should not be framed as an authorization bypass; the lock is an in-process concurrency primitive, not an access-control boundary. ### Version Software: concurrent-ruby Version: 1.3.6 Commit: 7a1b78941c081106c20a9ca0144ac73a48d254ab ### Details `release_write_lock` checks only whether the global counter indicates that a writer is running. It does not track or verify ownership: ```ruby def release_write_lock return true unless running_writer? c = @Counter.update { |counter| counter - RUNNING_WRITER } @ReadLock.broadcast @WriteLock.signal if waiting_writers(c) > 0 true end ``` Because ownership is not checked, a different thread can clear the `RUNNING_WRITER` bit while the original writer is still inside its critical section. Another writer can then acquire the write lock and run concurrently with the first writer. `release_read_lock` unconditionally decrements the shared counter: ```ruby def release_read_lock while true c = @Counter.value if @Counter.compare_and_set(c, c-1) if waiting_writer?(c) && running_readers(c) == 1 @WriteLock.signal end break end end true end ``` On a fresh lock, this changes the counter from `0` to `-1`. A later `acquire_read_lock` raises `Concurrent::ResourceLimitError` because the maximum-reader check masks the negative counter as saturated. # Reproduce From the root of a `concurrent-ruby` checkout, run: ```bash ruby -Ilib/concurrent-ruby - <<'RUBY' require 'concurrent/atomic/read_write_lock' require 'concurrent/version' require 'thread' puts "ruby=#{RUBY_DESCRIPTION}" puts "concurrent_ruby_version=#{Concurrent::VERSION}" puts "poc=ReadWriteLock release methods corrupt or bypass lock state" lock = Concurrent::ReadWriteLock.new events = Queue.new writer1_inside = false writer1 = Thread.new do lock.acquire_write_lock writer1_inside = true events << :writer1_acquired sleep 0.5 writer1_inside = false lock.release_write_lock events << :writer1_finished end events.pop puts 'writer1_acquired=true' intruder_result = nil intruder = Thread.new do intruder_result = lock.release_write_lock end intruder.join puts "wrong_thread_release_write_lock_returned=#{intruder_result}" writer2_entered_while_writer1_inside = nil writer2 = Thread.new do lock.acquire_write_lock writer2_entered_while_writer1_inside = writer1_inside lock.release_write_lock end writer2.join(0.25) puts "writer2_acquired_while_writer1_inside=#{writer2_entered_while_writer1_inside}" writer1.join lock2 = Concurrent::ReadWriteLock.new stray_read_release_result = lock2.release_read_lock counter_after_stray_read_release = lock2.instance_eval { @Counter.value } read_after_stray_release = begin lock2.acquire_read_lock 'acquired' rescue => error "#{error.class}: #{error.message}" end puts "stray_release_read_lock_returned=#{stray_read_release_result}" puts "counter_after_stray_read_release=#{counter_after_stray_read_release}" puts "acquire_read_after_stray_release=#{read_after_stray_release}" if intruder_result && writer2_entered_while_writer1_inside && counter_after_stray_read_release == -1 puts 'result=REPRODUCED wrong-thread write release and stray read-release corruption' else puts 'result=NOT_REPRODUCED' end ``` Expected result: - A second thread successfully calls `release_write_lock` while the first writer still holds the lock. - A second writer enters while the first writer is still inside the write critical section. - Calling `release_read_lock` on a fresh lock changes the counter to `-1`. - A subsequent read acquisition fails with `Concurrent::ResourceLimitError`. ### Log evidence Local reproduction output: ```text ruby=ruby 2.6.10p210 (2022-04-12 revision 67958) [universal.arm64e-darwin25] concurrent_ruby_version=1.3.6 poc=ReadWriteLock release methods corrupt or bypass lock state writer1_acquired=true wrong_thread_release_write_lock_returned=true writer2_acquired_while_writer1_inside=true stray_release_read_lock_returned=true counter_after_stray_read_release=-1 acquire_read_after_stray_release=Concurrent::ResourceLimitError: Too many reader threads result=REPRODUCED wrong-thread write release and stray read-release corruption ``` ### Impact This can break the write-lock mutual exclusion guarantee and can also leave a lock unusable after a stray read release. The impact is local to applications that expose or misuse the manual `acquire_*` / `release_*` APIs. If the lock protects integrity-sensitive mutable state, wrong-thread write release can allow concurrent writers and data races. The stray read-release path can cause denial of service by corrupting the lock counter. ### Credit Pranjali Thakur - depthfirst ([depthfirst.com](<http://depthfirst.com>))