CVE-2026-54081

Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in RealObjects PDFreactor ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

## Summary **Description** A PostScript-interpreter-driven Denial of Service (CWE-1325) vulnerability in veraPDF allows a remote attacker to exhaust validator memory or CPU by submitting a PDF whose Type 1 font `/FontFile` is a font program containing attacker-supplied PostScript. veraPDF's Type 1 font program parser dispatches every cleartext token through a hardcoded operator allow-list whose members include the unbounded `array N` allocation operator and the `for` control operator with no zero-increment guard. This affects all current versions of veraPDF-parser. ## Details The vulnerability resides in veraPDF-parser. Type 1 font program streams referenced from any Type 1 font's `/FontDescriptor /FontFile` are parsed by `Type1FontProgram` (veraPDF-parser/src/main/java/org/verapdf/pd/font/type1/Type1FontProgram.java), which extends `PSParser`. `parseFont` reads cleartext PostScript tokens until it encounters `eexec` (which switches into the encrypted private dictionary parser) or end-of-stream. Each non-`eexec` token is dispatched via `toExecute`, which gates execution behind a hardcoded allow-list. The allow-list explicitly admits both `ARRAY` (Type1FontProgram.java:98) and `FOR` (Type1FontProgram.java:100). When either keyword passes the gate, `operator.execute` delegates straight into the generic `PSOperator` implementation (`org.verapdf.parser.postscript.PSOperator`, methods `array()` at PSOperator.java:536-547 and `opFor()` at PSOperator.java:571-592), which apply no validation: 1. `array N` calls `COSArray.construct(N)` followed by `new ArrayList<>(N)` (COSArray.java:102), so the underlying `Object[]` is allocated up-front. Passing `2147483647` (`Integer.MAX_VALUE`) requests a 16 GB backing array on a 64-bit JVM. 2. `for` runs `for (long i = initial; i <= limit; i += increment)` with no validation of `increment`. With `increment == 0`, the loop never exits. In addition to the two shared primitives, `toExecute` introduces a third primitive specific to this code path: when an unknown operator is encountered, it looks the name up in `userDict` and recursively re-executes the value. There is no visited-set, no recursion-depth cap, and no detection of a cycle. A Type 1 font program that defines a name to itself, such as `/loop { loop } def loop`, recurses indefinitely on the JVM stack and throws `StackOverflowError` after ~16,000 frames. The interpreter is reachable on every Type 1 font validation. `GFPDType1Font`'s constructor unconditionally calls `program.parseFont()`. `Type1FontProgram.parseFont` only catches `PostScriptException` and rewraps it as `IOException`; it does not catch `OutOfMemoryError`, `StackOverflowError`, or wall-clock budget, so any of the three failure modes propagates out of font model construction and aborts the validation worker. A single payload byte sequence is sufficient. The conventional `%!PS-AdobeFont-1.0` header line is treated as a comment and skipped; the parser then begins consuming PostScript tokens, the very first `for` invocation enters the infinite loop, and the parser never reaches the `eexec` boundary that would normally end the cleartext section. ## Impact This impacts all current releases of the veraPDF-parser. Successful exploitation requires only that the target validate an attacker-supplied PDF; a single Type 1 font with a malicious `/FontFile` stream is sufficient.