CVE-2026-53941
mediumPriorität · verfolgen · 0EPSS 0.005 · 44. PerzentilUSEPSS · bewertet 2026-10-27
Inspektor Gadget is a set of tools and framework for data collection and system inspection on Kubernetes clusters and Linux hosts using eBPF. From 0.27.0 until 0.53.1, the uprobe library resolver can allow an unprivileged container to consume excessive CPU and block other containers from starting by supplying a crafted /etc/ld.so.cache file while an uprobe-based gadget is active. The parser in pkg/uprobetracer/ldcache_parser.go trusts EntryCount enough to perform excessive iteration, computes cache1Len with overflowing uint32 arithmetic, and repeatedly calls readStringFromBytes in pkg/uprobetracer/bytes.go, where byte-by-byte immutable string concatenation produces quadratic work. While this processing occurs, pkg/container-hook holds the fanotify container-start pause, allowing a crafted cache to delay startup for roughly a minute, prevent Docker from starting other containers, and degrade monitoring. Processing caches from already-running containers can still consume CPU but does not hold the new-container startup pause, and the advisory establishes no confidentiality or integrity impact. This issue is fixed in version 0.53.1.
cvss
Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.
Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen⚠ Quellen uneinig · low–medium · 2.7–6.9
SSVC
Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.
schwächen
Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.
betroffene Produkte (1)
Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.
- Go github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gadget0.27.0 → 0.53.1osvUSpkg:golang/github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gadget
Advisories (2)
Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.
- GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6qUprobe gadgets: unprivileged container's ld.so.cache causes high CPU utilization and container startup DoS2026-08-19ghsa · osvUS
## Summary An unprivileged container can block all other containers from starting on the same host by placing a crafted `/etc/ld.so.cache` file in its filesystem. When Inspektor Gadget attaches any uprobe-based gadget, it parses this file in the container startup path. A malicious cache causes ~53 seconds of CPU burn, during which Docker cannot start any other container. No special capabilities are required. ## Severity To be assessed — Availability impact, no confidentiality or integrity impact. ## Affected Versions All versions of Inspektor Gadget that support uprobe-based gadgets (trace_malloc, trace_open, trace_ssl, trace_grpc, etc.). ## Description When Inspektor Gadget attaches uprobe-based gadgets to containers, it resolves library paths by parsing the container's `/etc/ld.so.cache` file (`pkg/uprobetracer/ldcache_parser.go`). This file is fully controlled by the container. The parser has three vulnerabilities: 1. **Quadratic string building** (`pkg/uprobetracer/bytes.go:36-44`): The `readStringFromBytes` function concatenates one byte at a time (`res += string(data[i])`), which is O(n²) in Go due to string immutability. With a 16MB cache file containing large regions without null terminators, this causes massive CPU and memory churn. 2. **Insufficient entry count validation** (`pkg/uprobetracer/ldcache_parser.go:120`): The `EntryCount` field is read directly from the untrusted file. While a per-entry bounds check prevents out-of-bounds access, the loop still iterates up to `(fileSize - headerSize) / entrySize ≈ 700,000` times, calling `readStringFromBytes` on each iteration. 3. **Integer overflow in format detection** (`pkg/uprobetracer/ldcache_parser.go:174`): The `cache1Len` computation uses uint32 arithmetic (`ldCache1Size + cache1.EntryCount*ldCache1EntrySize`). With a crafted `EntryCount`, this overflows and produces a small value, causing the parser to misidentify the cache format. Combined, these cause ~53 seconds of CPU burn per container attachment when a crafted 16MB `/etc/ld.so.cache` is present. ## Impact - **Container runtime DoS**: IG uses fanotify hooks (`pkg/container-hook`) to pause container startup until uprobe attachment completes. While IG is blocked processing the malicious cache, this pause is held, and Docker serializes container starts — meaning no other container can start on the host until IG finishes. This effectively causes a denial of service on the entire container runtime, not just on IG itself. - **Container startup delay**: When any uprobe-based gadget is running (trace_malloc, trace_ssl, etc.), starting a container with a crafted ld.so.cache delays startup by ~1 minute. - **Monitoring degradation**: The IG daemon is blocked processing the malicious cache, potentially missing events from other containers. - **Amplification**: Multiple containers with crafted caches can be started simultaneously to amplify the effect. - **No special privileges required**: Any container can include a crafted `/etc/ld.so.cache` in its image, mount one via a volume, or overwrite it at runtime before IG starts a uprobe gadget. In this last case, IG inspects all already-running containers when the gadget starts — this still burns CPU but does not block other containers from starting (since the fanotify pause only applies to new container starts). ## Root Cause Analysis In `pkg/uprobetracer/ldcache_parser.go`, the function `readCacheFormat2` is called with the full file content: ```go for i := uint32(0); i < ldCache.EntryCount; i++ { entryOffset := ldEntriesOffset + i*ldCache2EntrySize if uint32(len(data)) <= entryOffset+ldCache2EntrySize { return nil // bounds check stops iteration } // ... reads entry ... key := readStringFromBytes(data, keyOffset) // O(n²) per call value := readStringFromBytes(data, valueOffset) // O(n²) per call } ``` The per-entry bounds check correctly prevents out-of-bounds access, but: - The loop iterates ~700K times (limited by file size, not EntryCount) - Each `readStringFromBytes` call uses quadratic string concatenation In `pkg/uprobetracer/bytes.go`: ```go func readStringFromBytes(data []byte, startPos uint32) string { res := "" for i := startPos; i < uint32(len(data)); i++ { if data[i] == 0 { return res } res += string(data[i]) // O(n²) — allocates new string each iteration } return "" } ``` ## Note on Slice Bounds Checks The code also performs slice accesses without proper bounds checks (e.g., `data[:len(cache2Header)]` when `data` may be shorter than 20 bytes, and `ldCacheFile[:len(cache1Header)]` when the file may be shorter than 11 bytes). In practice, a malicious container **cannot currently trigger a panic** from these missing checks. This is because Go's `io.ReadAll` (used to read the file) always returns slices with `cap >= 512` due to its initial buffer allocation (`make([]byte, 0, 512)` in Go's standard library). In Go, `s[:n]` only panics when `n > cap(s)`, not when `n > len(s)`. Since both header lengths (11 and 20) are well below 512, the slice expressions succeed — they simply read zero bytes beyond `len`, which don't match any valid header magic. However, this relies on an **undocumented implementation detail** of `io.ReadAll` which could change in future Go versions. The bounds checks are still necessary for correctness and defense in depth.
- GO-2026-6254Uprobe gadgets: unprivileged container's ld.so.cache causes high CPU utilization and container startup DoS in github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gadget2026-08-25vendor · osvUS
Uprobe gadgets: unprivileged container's ld.so.cache causes high CPU utilization and container startup DoS in github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gadget
auch bekannt als (2)
Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.
- GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6qosv
- GO-2026-6254osv
quellen
Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.
Referenzen (4) nvd
Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.
- https://github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gadget/commit/2ca55021acf675b65040beff2a5ec348054be782
- https://github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gadget/pull/5547
- https://github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gadget/releases/tag/v0.53.1
- https://github.com/inspektor-gadget/inspektor-gadget/security/advisories/GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6q
Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.
Kostenloser Scan