CVE-2026-53513
criticalPriorität · verfolgen · 0OT-Risiko · erhöhtEPSS 0.002 · 16. PerzentilEUUSEPSS · bewertet 2026-10-27
Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. Prior to 1.6.11, the @better-auth/sso plugin's POST /sso/register and POST /sso/update-provider endpoints accept attacker-controlled oidcConfig.userInfoEndpoint, tokenEndpoint, and jwksEndpoint URLs when skipDiscovery: true is set, store them on the ssoProvider row without origin validation, and fetch them during OIDC callback, allowing non-blind server-side request forgery and possible account linking when trustEmailVerified: true is configured. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.11.
cvss
Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.
Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen⚠ Quellen uneinig · high–critical · 8.8–9.6
SSVC
Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.
schwächen
Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.
betroffene Produkte (5)
Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.
Advisories (1)
Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.
- GHSA-5rr4-8452-hf4v@better-auth/sso provider registration has server-side request forgery via unvalidated OIDC endpoints2026-07-07ghsa · osvUS
### Am I affected? Users are affected if all of the following are true: - Their application uses `@better-auth/sso` at a version `>= 0.1.0, < 1.6.11` on the stable line, or any `1.7.0-beta.x` on the pre-release line. - The `sso()` plugin is added to their application's `betterAuth({ plugins: [...] })` array. - Any user with a valid Better Auth session can reach `POST /sso/register` (the plugin's default gate accepts any session). For the non-blind SSRF impact (full IAM credential or internal HTTP body exfiltration), no further configuration is required. For the account takeover escalation, additionally: - Developers set `sso({ trustEmailVerified: true, ... })`. - The developer's application deployment has accounts whose `email` overlaps with attacker-chosen domains. If developers do not enable the SSO plugin, their application is not affected. Fix: 1. Upgrade to `@better-auth/sso@1.6.11` or later. 2. If developers cannot upgrade, see workarounds below. ### Summary The `@better-auth/sso` plugin's `POST /sso/register` endpoint accepts attacker-controlled `oidcConfig.userInfoEndpoint`, `tokenEndpoint`, and `jwksEndpoint` URLs when `skipDiscovery: true` is set, persists them on the `ssoProvider` row without origin validation, then issues server-side fetches to those URLs during the OIDC callback. The fetched response body is reflected through the user profile, producing a non-blind SSRF reachable by any authenticated session. The same primitive exists on `POST /sso/update-provider`. ### Details The schema field types accept bare strings: no `.url()` validator, no origin gate. The discovery branch (`skipDiscovery: false`) routes URLs through `validateDiscoveryUrl`; the skip-discovery branch persists them as-is. At callback time three fetch sites read the stored URLs: `validateAuthorizationCode` for the token endpoint, `betterFetch` for the userInfo endpoint, and `validateToken` for the JWKS endpoint. When `trustEmailVerified: true` is configured, the attacker can escalate to account linking. A malicious userInfo response with `emailVerified: true` and a chosen `email` triggers OAuth auto-link against any pre-existing user row with that email, compounding the SSRF into account takeover. ### Patches Fixed in `@better-auth/sso@1.6.11`. Provider registration (`POST /sso/register` with `skipDiscovery: true`) and every `POST /sso/update-provider` request now validate each supplied OIDC endpoint URL (`authorizationEndpoint`, `tokenEndpoint`, `userInfoEndpoint`, `jwksEndpoint`, `discoveryEndpoint`) at registration time. A URL is rejected unless it satisfies one of two conditions: 1. Its host is publicly routable on the internet, evaluated through the `@better-auth/core/utils/host.isPublicRoutableHost` gate. RFC 1918 private ranges, RFC 4193 unique-local addresses, link-local addresses (including the cloud-metadata IP `169.254.169.254`), loopback, multicast, broadcast, and reserved ranges are rejected, along with cloud-metadata FQDNs. 2. Its origin is already listed in the application's `trustedOrigins` configuration. This preserves the documented escape hatch for customers running internal IdPs intentionally on private networks. The schema also tightens from `z.string()` to `z.url()` on those fields, so malformed URLs fail at parse time rather than at fetch time. Deployments running internal IdPs that previously worked must add the IdP's origin to `trustedOrigins` to keep working after upgrade. ### Workarounds If developers cannot upgrade immediately: - **Disable provider self-registration**: set `sso({ providersLimit: 0 })`. The limit is enforced before the schema branch, blocking every `/sso/register` regardless of `skipDiscovery`. - **Reverse-proxy gate**: block `POST /sso/register` and `POST /sso/update-provider` at the edge, or restrict to a denylist of source IPs and a small admin user list. - **Network-level egress controls**: block egress from the auth server to RFC 1918, RFC 4193, link-local ranges (`169.254.0.0/16`, `fe80::/10`), and the cloud-metadata FQDN list at the firewall or VPC level. AWS users should additionally enforce IMDSv2 (`HttpTokens: required`). - **Set `trustEmailVerified: false`** until upgrade. This caps the impact at non-blind SSRF and removes the account-takeover escalation, but does not stop the SSRF. ### Impact - **Server-Side Request Forgery (non-blind)**: the attacker reads response bodies from any HTTP endpoint reachable from the auth server, including cloud metadata services (AWS IMDS, GCP metadata FQDN), internal-only APIs, and infrastructure services such as Redis or admin panels bound to localhost. - **Account takeover** (when `trustEmailVerified: true`): the attacker mints a malicious userInfo response asserting `emailVerified: true` for an arbitrary email, triggering OAuth auto-link against pre-existing user rows. ### Credit Reported by Vaadata. ### Resources - [CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html) - [CWE-20: Improper Input Validation](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html) - [CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/441.html) - [CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/345.html)
auch bekannt als (3)
Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.
quellen
Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.
Referenzen (13)
Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.
- https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/37f60cb176cb53147da7dfd5ec15afa5b486e81ecnnvd
- https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/9574cnnvd
- https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/releasesPatchcnnvd
- https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/releases/tag/v1.6.11cnnvd
- https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-5rr4-8452-hf4vcnnvd
- https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/37f60cb176cb53147da7dfd5ec15afa5b486e81eenisa_euvd
- https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/9574enisa_euvd
- https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth/releases/tag/v1.6.11enisa_euvd
Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.
Kostenloser Scan