CVE-2026-41684

mediumPriorität · verfolgen · 0EPSS 0.004 · 35. PerzentilEURUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.41% (35th) EPSS
CVSS 6.5 · medium
Is it mine?
10 products
Prüfe deine Angriffsfläche
Who says so?
5 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · fstec_bdu · osv

EPSS · bewertet 2026-10-28

Incus is a system container and virtual machine manager. Prior to version 7.0.0, backup.GetInfo() trusts the inline backup/index.yaml config when present and only falls back to parsing the legacy backup/container/backup.yaml file if result.Config == nil. As a result, an archive can carry a valid inline config that passes the initial import preflight while also carrying a malformed legacy backup/container/backup.yaml file that is reparsed later from the restored file system. ParseConfigYamlFile() accepts YAML documents with no container section, and multiple downstream consumers then dereference. Container without checking for nil. Confirmed examples in the instance restore and import flow include backup.UpdateInstanceConfig() and internalImportFromBackup(). An authenticated user with permission to import instance backups may be able to crash the Incus daemon with a crafted backup archive whose inline backup/index.yaml is valid but whose extracted legacy backup.yaml omits container. The crash occurs in the restore path after archive extraction has begun. This issue has been patched in version 7.0.0.

01

cvss

Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.

6.5
010

Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen

v3.16.5mediumAV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:Hsecondary · FSTEC (BDU) RU
v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:Hsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:Hsecondary · security-advisories@github.comAusnutzbarkeit 2.8 · Auswirkung 3.6
v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:Hsecondary · OSV
v3.16mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

SSVC

Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.

Trackcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

schwächen

Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.

04

betroffene Produkte (10)

Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.

05

Advisories (2)

Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.

  • GHSA-x5r6-jr56-89pvIncus has Nil Dereferences on Restore via Malformed YAML2026-05-04ghsa · osvUS

    ### Summary ### Details It was found that backup.GetInfo() trusts the inline backup/index.yaml config when present and only falls back to parsing the legacy backup/container/backup.yaml file if result.Config == nil. As a result, an archive can carry a valid inline config that passes the initial import preflight while also carrying a malformed legacy backup/container/backup.yaml file that is reparsed later from the restored file system. ParseConfigYamlFile() accepts YAML documents with no container section, and multiple downstream consumers then dereference .Container without checking for nil. Confirmed examples in the instance restore and import flow include backup.UpdateInstanceConfig() and internalImportFromBackup(). An authenticated user with permission to import instance backups may be able to crash the Incus daemon with a crafted backup archive whose inline backup/index.yaml is valid but whose extracted legacy backup.yaml omits container. The crash occurs in the restore path after archive extraction has begun. The flow is as follows: A crafted backup archive contains a valid backup/index.yaml file together with a malformed backup/container/backup.yaml file that omits the container section. backup.GetInfo() parses backup/index.yaml successfully, so bInfo.Config is populated from the inline config. Because result.Config != nil, GetInfo() does not fall back to backup/container/backup.yaml. instances_post.go then builds the request from bInfo.Config.Container, which succeeds because the inline config is valid. Later, storage unpack extracts backup/container/backup.yaml into the instance volume as <mountPath>/backup.yaml. backend.go then calls backup.UpdateInstanceConfig(..., mountPath), which reparses <mountPath>/backup.yaml through ParseConfigYamlFile(). Because ParseConfigYamlFile() accepts YAML with no container section, backup.Container == nil, and later access to backup.Container.Devices or backup.Container.ExpandedDevices can trigger a nil-pointer dereference. Affected Files: - https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/backup/backup_info.go#L87 - https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/backup/backup_info.go#L115 - https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/backup/backup_config_utils.go#L85 - https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/backup/backup_config_utils.go#L159 - https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/internal/server/storage/backend.go#L809 - https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/v6.22.0/cmd/incusd/api_internal.go#L749 The initial backup-metadata parser prefers inline backup/index.yaml content: Affected Code: ``` if hdr.Name == backupIndexPath { err = yaml.NewDecoder(tr).Decode(&result) ``` The legacy backup/container/backup.yaml file is only parsed if the inline config is absent: Affected Code: ``` if result.Config == nil && hdr.Name == "backup/container/backup.yaml" { err = yaml.NewDecoder(tr).Decode(&result.Config) ``` ParseConfigYamlFile() accepts an empty YAML document, or one with no container section, without validation: Affected Code: ``` func ParseConfigYamlFile(path string) (*config.Config, error) { data, err := os.ReadFile(path) ... backupConf := config.Config{} err = yaml.Unmarshal(data, &backupConf) ``` UpdateInstanceConfig() conditionally uses backup.Container at first but later dereferences it unconditionally: Affected Code: ``` if backup.Container != nil { backup.Container.Name = b.Name backup.Container.Project = b.Project } if updateRootDevicePool(backup.Container.Devices, pool.Name) { rootDiskDeviceFound = true } if updateRootDevicePool(backup.Container.ExpandedDevices, pool.Name) { rootDiskDeviceFound = true } ``` Another confirmed sink is present in internalImportFromBackup(): Affected Code: ``` if allowNameOverride { backupConf.Container.Name = instName } if instName != backupConf.Container.Name { return fmt.Errorf("Instance name requested %q doesn't match instance name in backup config %q", instName, backupConf.Container.Name) } ``` This was confirmed as follows: Command: ``` go test ./test/fuzz -run='TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference' -count=1 -v ``` Output: ``` === RUN TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference === RUN TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference/legacy_backup_empty extracted_backup_yaml_poc_test.go:70: UpdateInstanceConfig panicked on malformed extracted backup.yaml (container is nil): runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference === RUN TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference/legacy_backup_pool_only extracted_backup_yaml_poc_test.go:70: UpdateInstanceConfig panicked on malformed extracted backup.yaml (container is nil): runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference === RUN TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference/legacy_backup_volume_only extracted_backup_yaml_poc_test.go:70: UpdateInstanceConfig panicked on malformed extracted backup.yaml (container is nil): runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference --- FAIL: TestExtractedBackupYAMLMissingContainerNilDereference (0.21s) FAIL ``` It is recommended to validate the parsed legacy backup.yaml structure before any dereference and to fail with a standard error if Container is missing: Proposed Fix: ``` if backup.Container == nil { return errors.New("No container struct in the backup file found") } ``` That validation should be added at minimum in: backup.UpdateInstanceConfig() and internalImportFromBackup() before any backupConf.Container.* access More broadly, it is recommended to centralize backup-config validation so that both inline backup/index.yaml and extracted legacy backup.yaml files are checked against the same structural requirements before any restore or import consumer uses them. A patch is available at https://github.com/lxc/incus/releases/tag/v7.0.0. ### Credit This issue was discovered and reported by the team at 7asecurity (https://7asecurity.com/)

  • GO-2026-5742Incus has Nil Dereferences on Restore via Malformed YAML in github.com/lxc/incus2026-06-25vendor · osvUS

    Incus has Nil Dereferences on Restore via Malformed YAML in github.com/lxc/incus

06

auch bekannt als (7)

Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.

07

quellen

Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.

veröffentlicht 2026-05-07geändert 2026-10-26
08

Referenzen (6)

Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.

scry

Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.

Kostenloser Scan