CVE-2026-40103

mediumPriorität · verfolgen · 22OT-Risiko · erhöhtEPSS 0.002 · 13. PerzentilEUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.22% (13th) EPSS
CVSS 5.4 · medium
Is it mine?
4 products
Prüfe deine Angriffsfläche
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv · nvd

EPSS · bewertet 2026-10-27

Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to 2.3.0, Vikunja's scoped API token enforcement for custom project background routes is method-confused. A token with only projects.background can successfully delete a project background, while a token with only projects.background_delete is rejected. This is a scoped-token authorization bypass. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.0.

01

cvss

Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.

5.4
010

Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen

v3.15.4mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Lprimary · NVD / NIST USAusnutzbarkeit 2.8 · Auswirkung 2.5
v3.14.3mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.14.3mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comAusnutzbarkeit 2.8 · Auswirkung 1.4
v3.15.4mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Lsecondary · OSV
v3.15mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

SSVC

Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

schwächen

Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.

04

betroffene Produkte (4)

Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.

05

Advisories (2)

Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.

  • GHSA-v479-vf79-mg83Vikunja: Scoped API tokens with projects.background permission can delete project backgrounds2026-04-10ghsa · osvUS

    ### Summary Vikunja's scoped API token enforcement for custom project background routes is method-confused. A token with only `projects.background` can successfully delete a project background, while a token with only `projects.background_delete` is rejected. This is a scoped-token authorization bypass. ### Details I verified this locally on commit `c5450fb55f5192508638cbb3a6956438452a712e`. Relevant code paths: * `pkg/models/api_routes.go` * `pkg/routes/routes.go` * `pkg/modules/background/handler/background.go` Route registration exposes separate permissions for the same path: * `GET /api/v1/projects/:project/background` -> `projects.background` * `DELETE /api/v1/projects/:project/background` -> `projects.background_delete` At enforcement time, `CanDoAPIRoute()` falls back to the parent group and reconstructs the child permission from the path segments only. For the DELETE request, that becomes `background`, so the matcher accepts any token containing `projects.background` without re-checking the HTTP method or matching the stored route detail. This matters because `RemoveProjectBackground()` is a real destructive operation: * It checks project update rights. * It deletes the background file if present. * It clears the project's `BackgroundFileID`. ### PoC 1. Log in as a user who can update a project that already has a background. 2. Create an API token with only: `{"projects":["background"]}` 3. Send: `DELETE /api/v1/projects/<project_id>/background` `Authorization: Bearer <token>` 4. Observe that the request succeeds and the project background is removed. **For comparison:** 1. Create an API token with only: `{"projects":["background_delete"]}` 2. Repeat the same DELETE request. 3. Observe that the request is rejected with `401 Unauthorized`. I confirmed this locally with three validations: 1. `/api/v1/routes` advertises both `background` and `background_delete`. 2. The matcher unit test proves `CanDoAPIRoute()` accepts DELETE for `background`. 3. The webtest proves a real API token with only `background` successfully deletes the background. ### Impact Scoped API tokens can exceed their intended capability. A token intended for project background access can delete project backgrounds, which weakens the trust model for automation and third-party integrations that rely on narrowly scoped tokens. The attacker needs a valid API token created by a user who has update rights on the target project, but the token itself only needs the weaker `projects.background` permission.

  • GO-2026-5650Vikunja: Scoped API tokens with projects.background permission can delete project backgrounds in code.vikunja.io/api2026-06-25vendor · osvUS

    Vikunja: Scoped API tokens with projects.background permission can delete project backgrounds in code.vikunja.io/api. NOTE: The source advisory for this report contains additional versions that could not be automatically mapped to standard Go module versions. (If this is causing false-positive reports from vulnerability scanners, please suggest an edit to the report.) The additional affected modules and versions are: code.vikunja.io/api before v2.3.0.

06

auch bekannt als (5)

Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.

07

quellen

Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.

veröffentlicht 2026-04-10geändert 2026-10-26
08

Referenzen (14)

Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.

scry

Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.

Kostenloser Scan