CVE-2026-40103
mediumPriorität · verfolgen · 22OT-Risiko · erhöhtEPSS 0.002 · 13. PerzentilEUUSEPSS · bewertet 2026-10-27
Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to 2.3.0, Vikunja's scoped API token enforcement for custom project background routes is method-confused. A token with only projects.background can successfully delete a project background, while a token with only projects.background_delete is rejected. This is a scoped-token authorization bypass. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.0.
cvss
Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.
Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen
SSVC
Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.
schwächen
Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.
betroffene Produkte (4)
Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.
Advisories (2)
Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.
- GHSA-v479-vf79-mg83Vikunja: Scoped API tokens with projects.background permission can delete project backgrounds2026-04-10ghsa · osvUS
### Summary Vikunja's scoped API token enforcement for custom project background routes is method-confused. A token with only `projects.background` can successfully delete a project background, while a token with only `projects.background_delete` is rejected. This is a scoped-token authorization bypass. ### Details I verified this locally on commit `c5450fb55f5192508638cbb3a6956438452a712e`. Relevant code paths: * `pkg/models/api_routes.go` * `pkg/routes/routes.go` * `pkg/modules/background/handler/background.go` Route registration exposes separate permissions for the same path: * `GET /api/v1/projects/:project/background` -> `projects.background` * `DELETE /api/v1/projects/:project/background` -> `projects.background_delete` At enforcement time, `CanDoAPIRoute()` falls back to the parent group and reconstructs the child permission from the path segments only. For the DELETE request, that becomes `background`, so the matcher accepts any token containing `projects.background` without re-checking the HTTP method or matching the stored route detail. This matters because `RemoveProjectBackground()` is a real destructive operation: * It checks project update rights. * It deletes the background file if present. * It clears the project's `BackgroundFileID`. ### PoC 1. Log in as a user who can update a project that already has a background. 2. Create an API token with only: `{"projects":["background"]}` 3. Send: `DELETE /api/v1/projects/<project_id>/background` `Authorization: Bearer <token>` 4. Observe that the request succeeds and the project background is removed. **For comparison:** 1. Create an API token with only: `{"projects":["background_delete"]}` 2. Repeat the same DELETE request. 3. Observe that the request is rejected with `401 Unauthorized`. I confirmed this locally with three validations: 1. `/api/v1/routes` advertises both `background` and `background_delete`. 2. The matcher unit test proves `CanDoAPIRoute()` accepts DELETE for `background`. 3. The webtest proves a real API token with only `background` successfully deletes the background. ### Impact Scoped API tokens can exceed their intended capability. A token intended for project background access can delete project backgrounds, which weakens the trust model for automation and third-party integrations that rely on narrowly scoped tokens. The attacker needs a valid API token created by a user who has update rights on the target project, but the token itself only needs the weaker `projects.background` permission.
- GO-2026-5650Vikunja: Scoped API tokens with projects.background permission can delete project backgrounds in code.vikunja.io/api2026-06-25vendor · osvUS
Vikunja: Scoped API tokens with projects.background permission can delete project backgrounds in code.vikunja.io/api. NOTE: The source advisory for this report contains additional versions that could not be automatically mapped to standard Go module versions. (If this is causing false-positive reports from vulnerability scanners, please suggest an edit to the report.) The additional affected modules and versions are: code.vikunja.io/api before v2.3.0.
auch bekannt als (5)
Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.
quellen
Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.
Referenzen (14)
Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2026-40103cnnvd
- https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/commit/6a0f39b252a81fa4b19dc56dc889183acc9225aecnnvd
- https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/pull/2584cnnvd
- https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/releasesPatchcnnvd
- https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/releases/tag/v2.3.0cnnvd
- https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/security/advisories/GHSA-v479-vf79-mg83cnnvd
- https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/commit/6a0f39b252a81fa4b19dc56dc889183acc9225aeenisa_euvd
- https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/pull/2584enisa_euvd
Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.
Kostenloser Scan