CVE-2026-34760

highPriorität · verfolgen · 28EPSS 0.003 · 19. PerzentilDEEUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.27% (19th) EPSS
CVSS 7.1 · high
Is it mine?
6 products
Prüfe deine Angriffsfläche
Who says so?
5 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv · cert_bund

EPSS · bewertet 2026-10-27

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). From version 0.5.5 to before version 0.18.0, Librosa defaults to using numpy.mean for mono downmixing (to_mono), while the international standard ITU-R BS.775-4 specifies a weighted downmixing algorithm. This discrepancy results in inconsistency between audio heard by humans (e.g., through headphones/regular speakers) and audio processed by AI models (Which infra via Librosa, such as vllm, transformer). This issue has been patched in version 0.18.0.

01

cvss

Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.

7.1
010

Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen⚠ Quellen uneinig · medium–high · 5.9–7.1

v3.17.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:Lprimary · NVD / NIST USAusnutzbarkeit 2.8 · Auswirkung 4.2
v3.15.9mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:Lsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.15.9mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:Lsecondary · security-advisories@github.comAusnutzbarkeit 1.6 · Auswirkung 4.2
v3.15.9mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:Lsecondary · OSV
v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

SSVC

Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.

Trackcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

schwächen

Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.

04

betroffene Produkte (6)

Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.

05

Advisories (3)

Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.

  • WID-SEC-W-2026-0987vllm: Mehrere SchwachstellenDeutsch2026-04-07csaf · cert_bundDE

    Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in vllm ausnutzen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen.

  • GHSA-6c4r-fmh3-7rh8vLLM: Processing differential in multi-channel audio downmixing enables hidden-input/moderation bypass for audio models2026-07-17ghsa · osvUS

    ## Issue Description Librosa defaults to using `numpy.mean` for mono downmixing (`to_mono`), while the international standard ITU-R BS.775-4 specifies a weighted downmixing algorithm. This discrepancy results in: - Inconsistency between audio heard by humans (e.g., through headphones/regular speakers) and audio processed by AI models (Which infra via Librosa, such as vllm, transformer). https://github.com/librosa/librosa/blob/af8c839fb15317fa2712ea66e7a22da6a9267b32/librosa/core/audio.py#L478 ## Attack Scenario and Impact ### LFE (Low-Frequency Effects) Channel Exploit Attackers can craft special multichannel audio files containing: 1. Normal content in front channels (L/R) 2. Either interference signals or hidden content in the LFE channel **Notice:** It is worth noting that not only the LFE channel is excluded, but in fact, channels beyond the 6th (such as rear surround channels, overhead channels, height speakers, etc.) are also not supported. **Attack Methodology:** Attackers can create specially engineered multichannel audio with LFE interference, where front channels (L/R) contain normal content while the LFE channel carries interference signals or hidden content. When played on consumer devices that ignore LFE channels, only the normal content is heard. However, when processed by AI systems using Librosa (which mixes all channels), the LFE interference affects speech recognition feature extraction or masks critical detection features. This enables malicious content to bypass AI detection while still reaching end users, potentially compromising voice authentication systems, evading content moderation, or disrupting speech recognition accuracy. **Potential Exploitation Scenarios:** - Voice authentication systems may be tricked into accepting anomalous audio - Content moderation systems may fail to detect prohibited content hidden in LFE channels - Speech recognition systems may produce incorrect transcriptions **Note:** `torch.audio` implements this correctly. Failure to do so may lead to inconsistencies between training and test audio, resulting in performance degradation. ## Resources - [ITU-R BS.775-4 Standard](https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/bs/R-REC-BS.775-4-202212-I!!PDF-E.pdf) - [Librosa Source Code](https://github.com/librosa/librosa/blob/af8c839fb15317fa2712ea66e7a22da6a9267b32/librosa/core/audio.py#L478) - [Librosa securty report](https://github.com/librosa/librosa/security/advisories/GHSA-vfm7-86xr-5mrh) ## Fixes - https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/37058, which removes the librosa dependency from vLLM.

  • PYSEC-2026-22992026-04-02vendor · osvUS

    vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). From version 0.5.5 to before version 0.18.0, Librosa defaults to using numpy.mean for mono downmixing (to_mono), while the international standard ITU-R BS.775-4 specifies a weighted downmixing algorithm. This discrepancy results in inconsistency between audio heard by humans (e.g., through headphones/regular speakers) and audio processed by AI models (Which infra via Librosa, such as vllm, transformer). This issue has been patched in version 0.18.0.

06

auch bekannt als (5)

Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.

07

quellen

Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.

veröffentlicht 2026-04-02geändert 2026-07-24
08

Referenzen (13)

Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.

scry

Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.

Kostenloser Scan