CVE-2026-32028
mediumPriorität · verfolgen · 0OT-Risiko · erhöhtEPSS 0.002 · 11. PerzentilDEEUUSEPSS · bewertet 2026-10-27
OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.25 fail to enforce dmPolicy and allowFrom authorization checks on Discord direct-message reaction notifications, allowing non-allowlisted users to enqueue reaction-derived system events. Attackers can exploit this inconsistency by reacting to bot-authored DM messages to bypass DM authorization restrictions and trigger downstream automation or tool policies.
cvss
Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.
Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen⚠ Quellen uneinig · low–medium · 1.7–6.3
SSVC
Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.
schwächen
Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.
betroffene Produkte (4)
Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.
Advisories (2)
Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.
- WID-SEC-W-2026-0542OpenClaw: Mehrere SchwachstellenDeutsch2026-02-25csaf · cert_bundDE
Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenClaw ausnutzen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, um Informationen offenzulegen, und um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.
- GHSA-354r-7mfh-7rh2OpenClaw: Discord DM reaction ingress missed dmPolicy/allowFrom checks in restricted setups2026-03-03ghsa · osvUS
### Summary In OpenClaw `<= 2026.2.24`, Discord direct-message reaction notifications did not consistently apply the same DM authorization checks (`dmPolicy` / `allowFrom`) that are enforced for normal DM message ingress. In restrictive DM setups, a non-allowlisted Discord user who can react to a bot-authored DM message could still enqueue a reaction-derived system event in the session. This is a reaction-only ingress inconsistency. By itself it does not directly execute commands; practical impact depends on downstream automation/tool policy. ### Details The DM message path already enforces `dmPolicy`/`allowFrom` authorization, but the DM reaction-notification path previously allowed event enqueue under reaction mode checks without that same authorization gate. Fix in `main` aligns reaction ingress with normal message preflight for Discord DM/group-DM/guild policy boundaries and applies equivalent DM reaction authorization hardening for Slack to keep channel behavior consistent. ### Affected Packages / Versions - `npm` package: `openclaw` - Affected: `<= 2026.2.24` - Patched: `>= 2026.2.25` ### Fix Commit(s) - `aedf62ac7e669a89c7b299201bf6537dc6b12e0e` ### Release Process Note `patched_versions` is pre-set to the release (`2026.2.25`) so after npm release the advisory is published. Thanks @tdjackey for reporting.
auch bekannt als (3)
Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.
quellen
Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.
Referenzen (10)
Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/aedf62ac7e669a89c7b299201bf6537dc6b12e0ecnnvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/releasesPatchcnnvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-354r-7mfh-7rh2cnnvd
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-missing-authorization-check-in-discord-dm-reaction-ingresscnnvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/aedf62ac7e669a89c7b299201bf6537dc6b12e0eenisa_euvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-354r-7mfh-7rh2enisa_euvd
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-missing-authorization-check-in-discord-dm-reaction-ingressenisa_euvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/aedf62ac7e669a89c7b299201bf6537dc6b12e0ePatchnvd
Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.
Kostenloser Scan