CVE-2026-28744

highPriorität · verfolgen · 0OT-Risiko · erhöhtEPSS 0.004 · 37. PerzentilDEEURUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.43% (37th) EPSS
CVSS 8.1 · high
Is it mine?
7 products
Prüfe deine Angriffsfläche
Who says so?
5 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · fstec_bdu · osv

EPSS · bewertet 2026-10-27

Gitea versions up to and including 1.26.1 allow Git smart HTTP requests authenticated with bearer tokens to bypass repository token scope checks.

01

cvss

Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.

8.1
010

Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen

v3.18.1highAV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Nsecondary · FSTEC (BDU) RU
v3.18.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.18.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:NsecondaryAusnutzbarkeit 2.8 · Auswirkung 5.2
v3.18.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.17.4highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

SSVC

Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: totalcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

schwächen

Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.

04

betroffene Produkte (7)

Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.

05

Advisories (3)

Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.

  • WID-SEC-W-2026-1637Gitea: Mehrere SchwachstellenDeutsch2026-05-21csaf · cert_bundDE

    Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Gitea ausnutzen, um möglicherweise erweiterte Privilegien zu erlangen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen oder Daten zu manipulieren und offenzulegen.

  • GHSA-cc8w-r4qh-3v65Gitea: Git Smart HTTP Skips Repository Token Scopes for Bearer Tokens2026-06-16ghsa · osvUS

    ### Summary Gitea v1.26.1 enforces repository-scoped access-token permissions on repository operations. In the Git Smart HTTP path, however, this check runs only when the token is presented via HTTP Basic authentication — `CheckRepoScopedToken()` returns early unless `ctx.IsBasicAuth` is true — so the same token sent as `Authorization: Bearer <token>` bypasses the scope check entirely. As a result, a PAT or OAuth2 token presented as a Bearer credential can clone or fetch private repositories without the `read:repository` scope, and likewise reach the Git push without `write:repository`. ### Details Git Smart HTTP routes allow both Basic auth and OAuth2/Bearer auth: ```go // routers/web/web.go addOwnerRepoGitHTTPRouters( m, repo.HTTPGitEnabledHandler, webAuth.AllowBasic, webAuth.AllowOAuth2, repo.CorsHandler(), optSignInFromAnyOrigin, context.UserAssignmentWeb(), ) ``` The Git HTTP authorization path calls `CheckRepoScopedToken()` before falling through to normal repository RBAC: ```go // routers/web/repo/githttp.go if askAuth { if !ctx.IsSigned { ctx.HTTPError(http.StatusUnauthorized) return nil } context.CheckRepoScopedToken(ctx, repo, auth_model.GetScopeLevelFromAccessMode(accessMode)) if ctx.Written() { return nil } // normal repository RBAC follows } ``` However, `CheckRepoScopedToken()` only enforces token scopes for Basic-authenticated requests: ```go // services/context/permission.go func CheckRepoScopedToken(ctx *Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, level auth_model.AccessTokenScopeLevel) { if !ctx.IsBasicAuth || ctx.Data["IsApiToken"] != true { return } scope, ok := ctx.Data["ApiTokenScope"].(auth_model.AccessTokenScope) if ok { requiredScopes := auth_model.GetRequiredScopes(level, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryRepository) // public-only and required repository scope checks follow } } ``` The Bearer/OAuth2 auth path still records the token scope: ```go // services/auth/oauth2.go accessTokenScope, uid := GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID(ctx, tokenSHA) if uid != 0 { store.GetData()["IsApiToken"] = true store.GetData()["ApiTokenScope"] = accessTokenScope } ``` Bearer PATs also set `IsApiToken=true` and `ApiTokenScope`, but `ctx.IsBasicAuth` remains false because the selected auth method is OAuth2/Bearer rather than Basic. The scope is therefore available but ignored. ### PoC This test creates a token for `user2` with only `read:notification`, then requests Git Smart HTTP refs for `user2/repo2`, which is private. The same token is rejected over Basic auth, but succeeds over Bearer auth. ```go func TestPOCGitSmartHTTPBearerTokenBypassesRepositoryScope(t *testing.T) { defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)() repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 2, OwnerName: "user2", Name: "repo2"}) assert.True(t, repo.IsPrivate) session := loginUser(t, "user2") token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeReadNotification) url := "/user2/repo2/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack" basicReq := NewRequest(t, "GET", url) basicReq.SetBasicAuth(token, "x-oauth-basic") MakeRequest(t, basicReq, http.StatusForbidden) bearerReq := NewRequest(t, "GET", url).AddTokenAuth(token) resp := MakeRequest(t, bearerReq, http.StatusOK) assert.Contains(t, resp.Body.String(), "refs/heads/master") } ``` ### Impact Any Gitea instance exposing Git Smart HTTP is affected when users use PATs or OAuth2 tokens as Bearer tokens. The attacker still needs a token for a user who has normal repository RBAC, so this does not grant access to repositories the token owner could not otherwise access. The vulnerability breaks the access-token scope boundary. A token intended only for unrelated scopes, such as `read:notification`, can clone or fetch private repository contents over Git Smart HTTP. The same root cause can affect write flows because `git-receive-pack` also calls the same repository scope check before normal write RBAC.

  • GO-2026-5321Gitea: Git Smart HTTP Skips Repository Token Scopes for Bearer Tokens in code.gitea.io/gitea2026-06-25vendor · osvUS

    Gitea: Git Smart HTTP Skips Repository Token Scopes for Bearer Tokens in code.gitea.io/gitea

06

auch bekannt als (7)

Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.

07

quellen

Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.

veröffentlicht 2026-07-03geändert 2026-10-25
08

Referenzen (12)

Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.

scry

Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.

Kostenloser Scan