CVE-2026-27794

mediumPriorität · verfolgen · 0EPSS 0.008 · 58. PerzentilEUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.84% (58th) EPSS
CVSS 6.6 · medium
Is it mine?
2 products
Prüfe deine Angriffsfläche
Who says so?
3 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv

EPSS · bewertet 2026-10-28

LangGraph Checkpoint defines the base interface for LangGraph checkpointers. Prior to version 4.0.0, a Remote Code Execution vulnerability exists in LangGraph's caching layer when applications enable cache backends that inherit from `BaseCache` and opt nodes into caching via `CachePolicy`. Prior to `langgraph-checkpoint` 4.0.0, `BaseCache` defaults to `JsonPlusSerializer(pickle_fallback=True)`. When msgpack serialization fails, cached values can be deserialized via `pickle.loads(...)`. Caching is not enabled by default. Applications are affected only when the application explicitly enables a cache backend (for example by passing `cache=...` to `StateGraph.compile(...)` or otherwise configuring a `BaseCache` implementation), one or more nodes opt into caching via `CachePolicy`, and the attacker can write to the cache backend (for example a network-accessible Redis instance with weak/no auth, shared cache infrastructure reachable by other tenants/services, or a writable SQLite cache file). An attacker must be able to write attacker-controlled bytes into the cache backend such that the LangGraph process later reads and deserializes them. This typically requires write access to a networked cache (for example a network-accessible Redis instance with weak/no auth or shared cache infrastructure reachable by other tenants/services) or write access to local cache storage (for example a writable SQLite cache file via permissive file permissions or a shared writable volume). Because exploitation requires write access to the cache storage layer, this is a post-compromise / post-access escalation vector. LangGraph Checkpoint 4.0.0 patches the issue.

01

cvss

Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.

6.6
010

Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen

v3.16.6mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.16.6mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · security-advisories@github.comAusnutzbarkeit 0.7 · Auswirkung 5.9
v3.16.6mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · OSV
v3.16.1mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

SSVC

Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.

Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: totalcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

schwächen

Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.

04

betroffene Produkte (2)

Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.

05

Advisories (2)

Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.

  • GHSA-mhr3-j7m5-c7c9LangGraph: BaseCache Deserialization of Untrusted Data may lead to Remote Code Execution 2026-02-25ghsa · osvUS

    ## Context A Remote Code Execution vulnerability exists in LangGraph's caching layer when applications enable cache backends that inherit from `BaseCache` and opt nodes into caching via `CachePolicy`. Prior to `langgraph-checkpoint` 4.0.0, `BaseCache` defaults to `JsonPlusSerializer(pickle_fallback=True)`. When msgpack serialization fails, cached values can be deserialized via `pickle.loads(...)`. ### Who is affected? Caching is not enabled by default. Applications are affected only when: - The application explicitly enables a cache backend (for example by passing `cache=...` to `StateGraph.compile(...)` or otherwise configuring a `BaseCache` implementation) - One or more nodes opt into caching via `CachePolicy` - The attacker can write to the cache backend (for example a network-accessible Redis instance with weak/no auth, shared cache infrastructure reachable by other tenants/services, or a writable SQLite cache file) Example (enabling a cache backend and opting a node into caching): ```py from langgraph.cache.memory import InMemoryCache from langgraph.graph import StateGraph from langgraph.types import CachePolicy def my_node(state: dict) -> dict: return {"value": state.get("value", 0) + 1} builder = StateGraph(dict) builder.add_node("my_node", my_node, cache_policy=CachePolicy(ttl=120)) builder.set_entry_point("my_node") graph = builder.compile(cache=InMemoryCache()) result = graph.invoke({"value": 1}) ``` With `pickle_fallback=True`, when msgpack serialization fails, `JsonPlusSerializer` can fall back to storing values as a `("pickle", <bytes>)` tuple and later deserialize them via `pickle.loads(...)`. If an attacker can place a malicious pickle payload into the cache backend such that the LangGraph process reads and deserializes it, this can lead to arbitrary code execution. Exploitation requires attacker write access to the cache backend. The serializer is not exposed as a network-facing API. This is fixed in `langgraph-checkpoint>=4.0.0` by disabling pickle fallback by default (`pickle_fallback=False`). ## Impact Arbitrary code execution in the LangGraph process when attacker-controlled cache entries are deserialized. ## Root Cause - `BaseCache` default serializer configuration inherited by cache implementations (`InMemoryCache`, `RedisCache`, `SqliteCache`): - `libs/checkpoint/langgraph/cache/base/__init__.py` (pre-fix default: `JsonPlusSerializer(pickle_fallback=True)`) - `JsonPlusSerializer` deserialization sink: - `libs/checkpoint/langgraph/checkpoint/serde/jsonplus.py` - `loads_typed(...)` calls `pickle.loads(data_)` when `type_ == "pickle"` and pickle fallback is enabled ## Attack preconditions An attacker must be able to write attacker-controlled bytes into the cache backend such that the LangGraph process later reads and deserializes them. This typically requires write access to a networked cache (for example a network-accessible Redis instance with weak/no auth or shared cache infrastructure reachable by other tenants/services) or write access to local cache storage (for example a writable SQLite cache file via permissive file permissions or a shared writable volume). Because exploitation requires write access to the cache storage layer, this is a post-compromise / post-access escalation vector. ## Remediation - Upgrade to `langgraph-checkpoint>=4.0.0`. ## Resources - ZDI-CAN-28385 - Patch: https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/pull/6677 - Patch diff: https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/langchain-ai/langgraph/pull/6677.patch - Credit: Peter Girnus (@gothburz), Demeng Chen, and Brandon Niemczyk (Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative)

  • PYSEC-2026-2574LangGraph: BaseCache Deserialization of Untrusted Data may lead to Remote Code Execution 2026-07-13vendor · osvUS

    ## Context A Remote Code Execution vulnerability exists in LangGraph's caching layer when applications enable cache backends that inherit from `BaseCache` and opt nodes into caching via `CachePolicy`. Prior to `langgraph-checkpoint` 4.0.0, `BaseCache` defaults to `JsonPlusSerializer(pickle_fallback=True)`. When msgpack serialization fails, cached values can be deserialized via `pickle.loads(...)`. ### Who is affected? Caching is not enabled by default. Applications are affected only when: - The application explicitly enables a cache backend (for example by passing `cache=...` to `StateGraph.compile(...)` or otherwise configuring a `BaseCache` implementation) - One or more nodes opt into caching via `CachePolicy` - The attacker can write to the cache backend (for example a network-accessible Redis instance with weak/no auth, shared cache infrastructure reachable by other tenants/services, or a writable SQLite cache file) Example (enabling a cache backend and opting a node into caching): ```py from langgraph.cache.memory import InMemoryCache from langgraph.graph import StateGraph from langgraph.types import CachePolicy def my_node(state: dict) -> dict: return {"value": state.get("value", 0) + 1} builder = StateGraph(dict) builder.add_node("my_node", my_node, cache_policy=CachePolicy(ttl=120)) builder.set_entry_point("my_node") graph = builder.compile(cache=InMemoryCache()) result = graph.invoke({"value": 1}) ``` With `pickle_fallback=True`, when msgpack serialization fails, `JsonPlusSerializer` can fall back to storing values as a `("pickle", <bytes>)` tuple and later deserialize them via `pickle.loads(...)`. If an attacker can place a malicious pickle payload into the cache backend such that the LangGraph process reads and deserializes it, this can lead to arbitrary code execution. Exploitation requires attacker write access to the cache backend. The serializer is not exposed as a network-facing API. This is fixed in `langgraph-checkpoint>=4.0.0` by disabling pickle fallback by default (`pickle_fallback=False`). ## Impact Arbitrary code execution in the LangGraph process when attacker-controlled cache entries are deserialized. ## Root Cause - `BaseCache` default serializer configuration inherited by cache implementations (`InMemoryCache`, `RedisCache`, `SqliteCache`): - `libs/checkpoint/langgraph/cache/base/__init__.py` (pre-fix default: `JsonPlusSerializer(pickle_fallback=True)`) - `JsonPlusSerializer` deserialization sink: - `libs/checkpoint/langgraph/checkpoint/serde/jsonplus.py` - `loads_typed(...)` calls `pickle.loads(data_)` when `type_ == "pickle"` and pickle fallback is enabled ## Attack preconditions An attacker must be able to write attacker-controlled bytes into the cache backend such that the LangGraph process later reads and deserializes them. This typically requires write access to a networked cache (for example a network-accessible Redis instance with weak/no auth or shared cache infrastructure reachable by other tenants/services) or write access to local cache storage (for example a writable SQLite cache file via permissive file permissions or a shared writable volume). Because exploitation requires write access to the cache storage layer, this is a post-compromise / post-access escalation vector. ## Remediation - Upgrade to `langgraph-checkpoint>=4.0.0`. ## Resources - ZDI-CAN-28385 - Patch: https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/pull/6677 - Patch diff: https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/langchain-ai/langgraph/pull/6677.patch - Credit: Peter Girnus (@gothburz), Demeng Chen, and Brandon Niemczyk (Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative)

06

auch bekannt als (6)

Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.

07

quellen

Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.

veröffentlicht 2026-02-25geändert 2026-06-17
08

Referenzen (13)

Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.

scry

Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.

Kostenloser Scan