CVE-2026-104850
highPriorität · verfolgen · 0OT-Risiko · erhöhtEPSS 0.002 · 13. PerzentilUSEPSS · bewertet 2026-10-27
MCP TypeScript SDK is the official TypeScript SDK for Model Context Protocol servers and clients. Starting in version 1.12.0 and prior to versions 1.31.0 and 2.2.0, the SDK's OAuth client support let the MCP server a client connected to decide which authorization server received the client's OAuth credentials. Stored and pre-provisioned credentials were not bound to the authorization server they belong to. A malicious or compromised MCP server could name its own authorization server in its protected resource metadata. Without any user interaction, the client would send that server the `refresh_token` and `client_secret` stored from an earlier sign-in (1.x), or the configured `client_secret` or signed assertion of a bundled non-interactive provider (1.x and 2.x). Only those applications that use the SDK as an MCP client over HTTP with an `authProvider`: your own `OAuthClientProvider`, or the bundled `ClientCredentialsProvider`, `PrivateKeyJwtProvider`, `StaticPrivateKeyJwtProvider` or (2.x) `CrossAppAccessProvider` and that may connect to an MCP server the owners does not fully trust while holding credentials for a legitimate authorization server are affected. `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk` 1.31.0 (1.x) and `@modelcontextprotocol/client` 2.2.0 (2.x) patch the issue. A workaround for those who cannot upgrade is available. 2.0.0 and 2.1.0 already accept `expectedIssuer`. On 1.x, the only workaround is to connect OAuth-enabled clients only to MCP servers you trust.
cvss
Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.
Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen
SSVC
Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.
schwächen
Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.
betroffene Produkte (2)
Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.
Advisories (1)
Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.
- GHSA-6qxp-vccf-f47hMCP TypeScript SDK: OAuth client could send credentials to an authorization server chosen by the MCP server2026-10-06ghsa · osvUS
### Summary In affected versions, the SDK's OAuth client let the MCP server decide which authorization server received the client's OAuth credentials. Credentials were not tied to the authorization server they belong to. A malicious or compromised MCP server could name its own authorization server. With no user interaction, the client would send it: - the `refresh_token` and `client_secret` stored from an earlier sign-in - the `client_secret` or signed assertion configured on a bundled provider ### Am I affected? Yes, if both of these hold: - your application uses the SDK's OAuth client over HTTP, through any of: - an `authProvider` on a transport - the `withOAuth()` middleware - direct calls to `auth()` or `fetchToken()` - it may connect to an MCP server you do not fully trust while holding credentials for a legitimate authorization server Affected versions: - `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk` 1.12.0 through 1.30.1 - `@modelcontextprotocol/client` 2.0.0 through 2.1.0, only for: - bundled providers without `expectedIssuer` - credentials stored or supplied without `issuer` - direct calls to `fetchToken()` - providers that read storage back through `OAuthTokensSchema` or `OAuthClientInformationSchema` Not affected: - MCP servers built with the SDK - stdio clients ### Fix Upgrade to: - 1.x: `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk` 1.31.0 or later - 2.x: `@modelcontextprotocol/client` 2.2.0 or later, and `@modelcontextprotocol/core` 2.2.0 or later if you import it directly The client now records the authorization server as `issuer` on saved credentials and does not send them to a different one. The user signs in again, or the call throws. In the following cases, upgrading to the patched version is not enough. You also need to make a change: - **Bundled providers** (`ClientCredentialsProvider`, `PrivateKeyJwtProvider`, `StaticPrivateKeyJwtProvider`, `CrossAppAccessProvider`): pass `expectedIssuer`, for example `expectedIssuer: 'https://auth.example.com'`. Without it they still use whichever authorization server the MCP server names. - **Credentials saved without `issuer`:** tokens and client information your `OAuthClientProvider` persisted (file, keychain, database) before upgrading, including everything 1.x saved before 1.31.0. They still go to whichever authorization server is named at first use. Add `issuer` to them, or clear them so users sign in again. - **Your own `OAuthClientProvider`:** save exactly what `saveTokens()` and `saveClientInformation()` are given, including `issuer`. For pre-registered credentials, include `issuer` in what `clientInformation()` returns. Not covered by this fix: - a new interactive sign-in, which still goes to the authorization server the MCP server names. Only complete sign-ins for servers you trust. - `refreshAuthorization()` and `exchangeAuthorization()` called directly - 2.x with `skipIssuerMetadataValidation: true` If an affected client may have connected to an untrusted MCP server, rotate its client secret or signing key and revoke its tokens. If you cannot upgrade yet, connect OAuth clients only to MCP servers you trust. 2.0.0 and 2.1.0 already accept `expectedIssuer`.
quellen
Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.
Referenzen (4) nvd
Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.
- https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/commit/edd12e282620ebf770d67316f19cf91d4112a1bd
- https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/pull/2887
- https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/releases/tag/v2.2.0
- https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/security/advisories/GHSA-6qxp-vccf-f47h
Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.
Kostenloser Scan