CVE-2026-102277
mediumPriorität · verfolgen · 0EPSS 0.003 · 22. PerzentilFRUSEPSS · bewertet 2026-10-23
The brace-expansion library generates arbitrary strings containing a common prefix and suffix. Prior to 1.1.21, 2.1.7, 3.0.9, and 5.0.12, the expand function handles untrusted {a},b}-shaped patterns with many trailing closing braces by restarting its scan once for each trailing closing brace. The successive full-input rescans with linear working-string growth cause quadratic CPU time and memory pressure that can block the Node.js event loop. The process eventually recovers, making the impact a recoverable CPU denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 1.1.21, 2.1.7, 3.0.9, and 5.0.12.
cvss
Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.
Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen
SSVC
Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.
schwächen
Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.
betroffene Produkte (4)
Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.
Advisories (2)
Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.
- GHSA-q2hr-2g5m-vwhrbrace-expansion: Quadratic-time expansion of the `{a},b}` rewrite causes CPU denial of service2026-09-29ghsa · osvUS
### Summary Expanding `{a},b}`-shaped input takes time quadratic in the number of literal `}` characters, blocking the event loop. Bash preserves a quirk where a brace group followed by a comma set still expands (`{a},b}`). The parser implements this by rewriting the string and restarting the scan. Each pass absorbs exactly one `}` and re-scans from the beginning, so `n` trailing braces cost `n` full passes. ### Reproduction ```js const build = n => '{a}' + '}'.repeat(n) + ',z}' for (const n of [8000, 16000, 32000, 64000, 128000]) { const t = Date.now() expand(build(n)) console.log(n, Date.now() - t + 'ms') } ``` | n | input | time | results | |---|---|---|---| | 8,000 | 8 KB | 110 ms | 2 | | 16,000 | 16 KB | 446 ms | 2 | | 32,000 | 32 KB | 1.7 s | 2 | | 64,000 | 64 KB | 6.9 s | 2 | | 128,000 | 128 KB | **27.7 s** | 2 | `ms/n^2` is flat at ~1.7 and each doubling of `n` costs exactly 4.0x - quadratic. 128 KB of input blocks the event loop for nearly half a minute to produce two results. ### Mechanism Instrumenting the rewrite branch confirms it runs exactly `n + 1` times, once per literal `}`, each re-scanning the whole string. There is a second multiplier. The rewrite replaces the group's closing `}` with the internal `escClose` sentinel, which is `'\0CLOSE' + Math.random() + '\0'` - about 25 characters. The working string therefore *grows* by ~25 characters on every pass: | n | input length | final string length | |---|---|---| | 1,000 | 1,006 | 26,006 | | 8,000 | 8,006 | 208,006 | So the input is inflated roughly 26x, and that factor multiplies both the quadratic constant and peak memory. This makes it partly a memory-pressure issue as well as a CPU one. ### Why `max` and `maxLength` do not help The cost is in parsing, before the result set exists. The payload yields 2 results regardless of size, so neither bound is ever reached. ### Impact An application passing an untrusted pattern to `expand()`, directly or through `minimatch` / `glob`, can have its event loop blocked for tens of seconds by a payload well under minimatch's 65,536-character cap. For a single-threaded Node server that is a full stall, not just a slow request. Degraded availability rather than a crash - the process recovers once the expansion completes. ### Affected versions Verified affected on 1.1.18, 2.1.4, 3.0.6 and 5.0.9, all within a few percent of each other (~460-490 ms at n=16,000). ### Patch The rewrite loop gets an iteration bound. Past the cap the remaining string is treated as non-expanding and returned literally, consistent with the existing `max` / `maxLength` caps, which truncate rather than throw. Note this bounds the number of passes, not the cost of each: worst-case work remains proportional to `cap x input length`. The cap is set low enough that the residual is bounded in practice, and far above what any realistic `{a},b}` input needs. ### Severity note Scored 5.3 Medium (`A:L`) for consistency with GHSA-3jxr-9vmj-r5cp, the other algorithmic-complexity advisory on this package (CWE-407), which uses the same vector. The stack-exhaustion advisories on this package score `A:H` because they crash the process outright; this one stalls it.
- CERTFR-2026-AVI-1378Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits IBMFrançais2026-10-23vendor · certfrFR
quellen
Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.
Referenzen (5) nvd
Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/33a5ef17b8d800bbfa8c52b14c39043b6aac1a96
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/bdff773f98e5988616b7039cc9b508df5d640b22
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/c55e67d8d8b1c56a2474afff15c2891166b2d364
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/commit/ffdfa3e3806bed17c0874b8f1439b084de354a7e
- https://github.com/juliangruber/brace-expansion/security/advisories/GHSA-q2hr-2g5m-vwhr
Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.
Kostenloser Scan