CVE-2025-52997

highPriorität · verfolgen · 30OT-Risiko · erhöhtEPSS 0.005 · 45. PerzentilEURUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.54% (45th) EPSS
CVSS 7.5 · high
Is it mine?
6 products
Prüfe deine Angriffsfläche
Who says so?
5 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · fstec_bdu · osv

EPSS · bewertet 2026-10-24

File Browser provides a file managing interface within a specified directory and it can be used to upload, delete, preview, rename and edit files. Prior to version 2.34.1, a missing password policy and brute-force protection makes the authentication process insecure. Attackers could mount a brute-force attack to retrieve the passwords of all accounts in a given instance. This issue has been patched in version 2.34.1.

01

cvss

Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.

7.5
010

Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen⚠ Quellen uneinig · medium–high · 5.9–7.5

v3.17.5highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USAusnutzbarkeit 3.9 · Auswirkung 3.6
v3.15.9mediumAV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · FSTEC (BDU) RU
v3.15.9mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.15.9mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comAusnutzbarkeit 2.2 · Auswirkung 3.6
v3.15.9mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.16.9mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

SSVC

Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

schwächen

Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.

04

betroffene Produkte (6)

Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.

05

Advisories (2)

Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.

  • GHSA-cm2r-rg7r-p7ggFile Browser vulnerable to insecure password handling2025-06-30ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary ## All user accounts authenticate towards a *File Browser* instance with a password. A missing password policy and brute-force protection makes it impossible for administrators to properly secure the authentication process. ## Impact ## Attackers can mount a brute-force attack against the passwords of all accounts of an instance. Since the application is lacking the ability to prevent users from choosing a weak password, the attack is likely to succeed. ## Vulnerability Description ## The application implement a classical authentication scheme using a username and password combination. While employed by many systems, this scheme is quite error-prone and a common cause for vulnerabilities. File Browser's implementation has multiple weak points: 1. Since the application is missing the capability for administrators to define a password policy, users are at liberty to set trivial and well-known passwords such as `secret` or even ones with only single digit like `1`. 2. New instances are set up with a default password of `admin` for the initial administrative account. This password is well known and easily guessable. While the documentation advises to change this password, the application does not technically enforce it. 3. The application does not implement any brute-force protection for the authentication endpoint. Attackers can make as many guesses for a password as the network bandwidth allows. The combination of these problems makes it likely, that an attacker will succeed in compromising at least one account in a *File Browser* instance, possibly even one with administrative privileges. The likelihood of such an attack increases substantially for internet-facing instances. ## Proof of Concept ## The insecure default credentials are documented on the application's website: ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/46c07d99-dc7b-4d6e-ac27-7eb002229201) The following HTTP communication shows, that a trivial password of `1` can be configured by a user: ```http hl:17 PUT /api/users/2 HTTP/1.1 Host: filebrowser.local:8080 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 Accept: */* Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br Referer: http://filebrowser.local:8080/settings/profile X-Auth: eyJ[...] Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Length: 319 Origin: http://filebrowser.local:8080 Connection: keep-alive Cookie: auth=eyJ[...] X-PwnFox-Color: cyan Priority: u=0 {"what":"user","which":["password"],"data":{"id":2,"locale":"en","viewMode":"mosaic","singleClick":false,"perm":{"admin":false,"execute":true,"create":true,"rename":true,"modify":true,"delete":true,"share":true,"download":true},"commands":[],"lockPassword":false,"hideDotfiles":false,"dateFormat":false,"password":"1"}} HTTP/1.1 200 OK Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; style-src 'unsafe-inline'; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:31:34 GMT Content-Length: 7 200 OK ``` The missing brute-force protection can easily be tested by repeatedly sending the following request to the application with a tool such as Burp or hydra. ``` POST /api/login HTTP/1.1 Host: filebrowser.local:8080 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 Accept: */* Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br Content-Type: application/json Content-Length: 52 Origin: http://filebrowser.local:8080 {"username":"admin","password":"myPasswordGuess","recaptcha":""} HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; style-src 'unsafe-inline'; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:39:48 GMT Content-Length: 14 403 Forbidden ``` After sending 3000 bad passwords to the application within a few seconds, a successful authentication is still possible for the account: ```http POST /api/login HTTP/1.1 Host: filebrowser.local:8080 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 Accept: */* Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br Content-Type: application/json Content-Length: 54 Origin: http://filebrowser.local:8080 Connection: keep-alive {"username":"admin","password":"myCorrectPassword","recaptcha":""} HTTP/1.1 200 OK Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; style-src 'unsafe-inline'; Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:39:58 GMT Content-Length: 508 eyJ[...] ``` ## Recommended Countermeasures ## The application should add an option to define a password policy in its administrative interface which allows to set a minimum length for passwords. The default settings should be in line with the NIST publication SP 800-63B. This means, that now passwords of fewer than 8 characters should ever be allowed by the application. Whenever a user sets a new password, the application should verify whether that password is part of a "known passwords" list. The application should either create a secure and random password for the `admin` account upon initialization or enforce an immediate password change when that user logs in for the first time using the default password. A brute-force protection needs to be implemented, which limits the allowed amount of authentication attempts per user within a certain timeframe. This implementation should employ *device tokens* to prevent targeted lockout attacks. In addition, it would be advisable to allow the integration of the application into and existing *Identity Provider* using protocols like LDAP or OIDC. ## Timeline ## * `2025-03-27` Identified the vulnerability in version 2.32.0 * `2025-04-11` Contacted the project * `2025-04-29` Vulnerability disclosed to the project * `2025-06-25` Uploaded advisories to the project's GitHub repository * `2025-06-26` CVE ID assigned by GitHub * `2025-06-29` Fix released in version 2.34.1. 12 minimum characters as default has been chosen since the implementation does not include protection against brute force attacks. ## References ## * [OWASP Authentication Cheat Sheet](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Authentication_Cheat_Sheet.html#implement-proper-password-strength-controls) * [NIST Special Publication 800-63B. Digital Identity Guidelines. Passwords](https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/sp800-63b.html#password) * [Pwned Passwords](https://haveibeenpwned.com/Passwords) * [Common Credentials](https://github.com/danielmiessler/SecLists/tree/master/Passwords/Common-Credentials) * [CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/307.html) * [CWE-521: Weak Password Requirements](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/521.html) * [CWE-1392: Use of Default Credentials](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1392.html) * [Original Advisory](https://github.com/sbaresearch/advisories/tree/public/2025/SBA-ADV-20250327-01_Filebrowser_Insecure_Password_Handling) ## Credits ## * Mathias Tausig ([SBA Research](https://www.sba-research.org/))

  • GO-2025-3792File Browser vulnerable to insecure password handling in github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser2025-07-28vendor · osvUS

    File Browser vulnerable to insecure password handling in github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser

06

auch bekannt als (6)

Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.

07

quellen

Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.

veröffentlicht 2025-06-30geändert 2026-06-17
08

Referenzen (10)

Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.

scry

Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.

Kostenloser Scan