CVE-2024-33871

highPriorität · verfolgen · 0EPSS 0.014 · 73. PerzentilDEEURUUS

grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled

Exploitable?

—

no known exploitation

Likely / severe?

1.43% (73rd) EPSS

CVSS 8.8 · high

Is it mine?

423 products

Prüfe deine Angriffsfläche

Who says so?

5 sources

cnnvd · enisa_euvd · fstec_bdu · cert_bund

EPSS · bewertet 2026-10-22

An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before 10.03.1. contrib/opvp/gdevopvp.c allows arbitrary code execution via a custom Driver library, exploitable via a crafted PostScript document. This occurs because the Driver parameter for opvp (and oprp) devices can have an arbitrary name for a dynamic library; this library is then loaded.

Behebungen

Hersteller-Fix, Mitigation oder Workaround, wie von den Quellen veröffentlicht.

Ein Hersteller-Fix ist verfügbar.

Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-doc-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.noarch as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3999
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-13.el8_10.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-doc-0:9.27-13.el8_10.noarch as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4000
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-doc-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.noarch as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4014
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4462
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-doc-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.noarch as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4527
Behobenghostscript-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4537
Behobenghostscript-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4537
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4537
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4537
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4537
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4537
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4537
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4537
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4537
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4537
Behobenlibgs-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4537
Behobenlibgs-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4537
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4537
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4537
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-doc-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.noarch as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4541
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4544
Behobenghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-cups-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-cups-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-cups-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-cups-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-doc-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.noarch as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-gtk-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-gtk-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-gtk-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenghostscript-gtk-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenlibgs-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenlibgs-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenlibgs-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenlibgs-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenlibgs-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenlibgs-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenlibgs-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Behobenlibgs-devel-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes described in this advisory, refer to: https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4549
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-doc-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.noarch as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-16.el9_4.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 9)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-13.el8_10.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-doc-0:9.27-13.el8_10.noarch as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.27-13.el8_10.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.27-13.el8_10.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.27-13.el8_10.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.27-13.el8_10.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.27-13.el8_10.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux CRB (v. 8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-doc-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.noarch as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-7.el9_0.3.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.9.0)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_6.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.6)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-doc-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.noarch as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.27-6.el8_8.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.8.8)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.25-6.el8_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v. 8.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-doc-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.noarch as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-dvipdf-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-fonts-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-tools-printing-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.aarch64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.54.0-12.el9_2.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder EUS (v.9.2)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debugsource-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-x11-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream AUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream E4S (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-debuginfo-0:9.27-2.el8_4.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream TUS (v.8.4)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-cups-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-cups-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-cups-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-cups-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-debuginfo-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-doc-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.noarch as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundghostscript-gtk-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.i686 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.ppc64le as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.s390x as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.
Workaroundlibgs-devel-0:9.25-5.el7_9.1.x86_64 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7 ELS)redhat_csaf
Passing the -dSAFER safety argument on the command line prevents the issue by locking security-related variables after Ghostscript’s initialization. In RHEL 9, -dSAFER is enabled by default, ensuring that insecure commands are rejected in a safer environment. This mitigation is equally effective in RHEL 7 and 8 when -dSAFER is explicitly passed on the command line, addressing the vulnerability that allows insecure commands within PostScript files. Since the OPVP device, cannot be removed, we recommend to use -dSAFER in RHEL 7 and 8 as a practical security measure.

cvss

Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.

8.8

010

Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen

v3.18.8highAV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · FSTEC (BDU) RU

v3.18.8highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · ENISA EU

v3.18.8highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HsecondaryAusnutzbarkeit 2.8 · Auswirkung 5.9

v3.18.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)

v3.18.8highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · Red Hat Product Security US

SSVC

Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.

Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: totalcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS

schwächen

Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.

CWE-20USCWE-20USCWE-94US

betroffene Produkte (423)

Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.

Amazon Linux 2alle Versionencert_bundDEcpe:/o:amazon:linux_2:-
Dell PowerProtect Data Domainalle Versionencert_bundDEcpe:/a:dell:powerprotect_data_domain:-
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain <7.10.1.50alle Versionencert_bundDE
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain <7.10.1.70alle Versionencert_bundDE
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain <7.13.1.20alle Versionencert_bundDE
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain <7.13.1.40alle Versionencert_bundDE
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain <8.3.0.0alle Versionencert_bundDE
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain <8.3.1.10alle Versionencert_bundDE
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain <8.4.0.0alle Versionencert_bundDE
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain Management Centeralle Versionencert_bundDEcpe:/a:dell:powerprotect_data_domain_management_center:-
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain OSalle Versionencert_bundDEcpe:/o:dell:powerprotect_data_domain_os:-
Fedora Linuxalle Versionencert_bundDEcpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:-
Gentoo Linuxalle Versionencert_bundDEcpe:/o:gentoo:linux:-
Oracle Linuxalle Versionencert_bundDEcpe:/o:oracle:linux:-
RESF Rocky Linuxalle Versionencert_bundDEcpe:/o:resf:rocky_linux:-
Red Hat Enterprise Linuxalle Versionencert_bundDEcpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:-
SUSE Linuxalle Versionencert_bundDEcpe:/o:suse:suse_linux:-
Ubuntu Linuxalle Versionencert_bundDEcpe:/o:canonical:ubuntu_linux:-
Xerox FreeFlow Print Server v9 for Solarisalle Versionencert_bundDEcpe:/a:xerox:freeflow_print_server:v9_for_solaris
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain< 7.10.1.50cert_bundDE

20 von 423 angezeigt

Advisories (11)

Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.

RHSA-2024:3999Red Hat Security Advisory: ghostscript security update2024-06-20csaf · redhat_csafUS
An update for ghostscript is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.
RHSA-2024:4000Red Hat Security Advisory: ghostscript security update2024-06-20csaf · redhat_csafUS
An update for ghostscript is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.
RHSA-2024:4014Red Hat Security Advisory: ghostscript security update2024-06-20csaf · redhat_csafUS
An update for ghostscript is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.
RHSA-2024:4462Red Hat Security Advisory: ghostscript security update2024-07-10csaf · redhat_csafUS
An update for ghostscript is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.
RHSA-2024:4527Red Hat Security Advisory: ghostscript security update2024-07-15csaf · redhat_csafUS
An update for ghostscript is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.
RHSA-2024:4537Red Hat Security Advisory: ghostscript security update2024-07-15csaf · redhat_csafUS
An update for ghostscript is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Support. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.
RHSA-2024:4541Red Hat Security Advisory: ghostscript security update2024-07-15csaf · redhat_csafUS
An update for ghostscript is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.
RHSA-2024:4544Red Hat Security Advisory: ghostscript security update2024-07-15csaf · redhat_csafUS
An update for ghostscript is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Telecommunications Update Service, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Update Services for SAP Solutions. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.
RHSA-2024:4549Red Hat Security Advisory: ghostscript security update2024-07-15csaf · redhat_csafUS
An update for ghostscript is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.
WID-SEC-W-2024-1412Ghostscript: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Ausführen von beliebigem ProgrammcodeDeutsch2024-06-19csaf · cert_bundDE
Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Ghostscript ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode mit den Rechten des Dienstes auszuführen.
WID-SEC-W-2025-0225Dell PowerProtect Data Domain: Mehrere SchwachstellenDeutsch2025-01-30csaf · cert_bundDE
Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Dell PowerProtect Data Domain ausnutzen, um erhöhte Rechte zu erlangen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

auch bekannt als (4)

Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.

quellen

Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.

cnnvd enisa_euvd fstec_bdu cert_bund redhat_csaf NVD CVE.org MITRE

veröffentlicht 2024-07-03geändert 2026-06-17

Referenzen (12)

Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.

scry

Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.

Kostenloser Scan