CVE-2022-31670
highPriorität · verfolgen · 31OT-Risiko · erhöhtEPSS 0.005 · 46. PerzentilEUUSEPSS · bewertet 2026-10-27
Harbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating tag retention policies. By sending a request to update a tag retention policy with an id that belongs to a project that the currently authenticated user doesn’t have access to, the attacker could modify tag retention policies configured in other projects.
cvss
Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.
Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen
SSVC
Eine Handlungsentscheidung — aus Ausnutzung und Auswirkung.
schwächen
Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.
betroffene Produkte (10)
Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.
Advisories (2)
Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.
- GHSA-3637-v6vq-xqqwHarbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating tag retention policies2022-09-16ghsa · osvUS
### Impact Harbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating tag retention policies. API call: PUT /retentions/{id} By sending a request to update a tag retention policy with an id that belongs to a project that the currently authenticated user doesn’t have access to, the attacker could modify tag retention policies configured in other projects. ### Patches This and similar issues are fixed in Harbor v2.5.2 and later. Please upgrade as soon as possible. ### Workarounds There are no workarounds available. ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in [the Harbor GitHub repository](https://github.com/goharbor/harbor) ### Credits Thanks to [Gal Goldstein](https://www.linkedin.com/in/gal-goldshtein/) and [Daniel Abeles](https://www.linkedin.com/in/daniel-abeles/) from [Oxeye Security](https://www.oxeye.io/) for reporting this issue.
- BIT-harbor-2022-31670Harbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating tag retention policies2024-11-20vendor · osvUS
Harbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating tag retention policies. By sending a request to update a tag retention policy with an id that belongs to a project that the currently authenticated user doesn’t have access to, the attacker could modify tag retention policies configured in other projects.
auch bekannt als (5)
Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.
quellen
Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.
Referenzen (4)
Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.
Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.
Kostenloser Scan