CVE-2020-11077

mediumPriorität · verfolgen · 31EPSS 0.029 · 87. PerzentilEUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
2.88% (87th) EPSS
CVSS 5 · medium
Is it mine?
10 products
Prüfe deine Angriffsfläche
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · nvd · osv

EPSS · bewertet 2026-10-27

In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the first request's body. Puma, however, would see it as two requests, and when processing the second request, send back a response that the proxy does not expect. If the proxy has reused the persistent connection to Puma to send another request for a different client, the second response from the first client will be sent to the second client. This is a similar but different vulnerability from CVE-2020-11076. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.6 and Puma 4.3.5.

01

cvss

Technischer Schweregrad, 0–10. Eine Zeile je Quelle.

7.5
010

Basiswert 0–10 · höher = schwerwiegender · Vektor überfahren zum Auflösen⚠ Quellen uneinig · medium–high · 5–7.5

v2.05mediumAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USAusnutzbarkeit 10 · Auswirkung 2.9
v3.17.5highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USAusnutzbarkeit 3.9 · Auswirkung 3.6
v3.16.8mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.16.8mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comAusnutzbarkeit 2.2 · Auswirkung 4
v3.16.8mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.16.9mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

schwächen

Die CWE-Schwächeklassen, zu denen dies gehört.

03

betroffene Produkte (10)

Betroffene Produkte und Versionsbereiche.

04

Advisories (1)

Hersteller- und Ökosystem-Meldungen dazu.

  • GHSA-w64w-qqph-5gxmHTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma2020-05-22ghsa · osvUS

    ### Impact This is a similar but different vulnerability to the one patched in 3.12.5 and 4.3.4. A client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the first request's body. Puma, however, would see it as two requests, and when processing the second request, send back a response that the proxy does not expect. If the proxy has reused the persistent connection to Puma to send another request for a different client, the second response from the first client will be sent to the second client. ### Patches The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.6 and Puma 4.3.5. ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in [Puma](https://github.com/puma/puma) * See our [security policy](https://github.com/puma/puma/security/policy)

05

auch bekannt als (3)

Weitere Namen und Kennungen dieser Entität.

06

quellen

Welche Quellen diesen Datensatz belegen und wann.

veröffentlicht 2020-05-22geändert 2026-06-17
08

Referenzen (25)

Externe Belege — Patches, Meldungen, Analysen.

scry

Angreifer nutzen Schwachstellen wie diese gegen im Internet exponierte Dienste aus. Sehen Sie mit einem kostenlosen Passiv-Scan, was exponiert ist.

Kostenloser Scan