T1659 Content Injection

Enterprise

Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic. Rather than luring victims to malicious payloads hosted on a compromised website (i.e., Drive-by Target followed by Drive-by Compromise), adversaries may initially access victims through compromised data-transfer channels where they can manipulate traffic and/or inject their own content. These compromised online network channels may also be used to deliver additional payloads (i.e., Ingress Tool Transfer) and other data to already compromised systems. Adversaries may inject content to victim systems in various ways, including: * From the middle, where the adversary is in-between legitimate online client-server communications (**Note:** this is similar but distinct from Adversary-in-the-Middle, which describes AiTM activity solely within an enterprise environment) * From the side, where malicious content is injected and races to the client as a fake response to requests of a legitimate online server Content injection is often the result of compromised upstream communication channels, for example at the level of an internet service provider (ISP) as is the case with "lawful interception."

01

Plattformen

Plattformen, für die dies gilt.

LinuxmacOSWindows
02

Taktiken

ATT&CK-Taktiken, denen diese Technik dient.

03

Gegenmaßnahmen

ATT&CK-Gegenmaßnahmen, die dies verringern.

05

NIST CSF 2.0 — Relevanzbereiche (Protect / Detect)

NIST-CSF-2.0-Bereiche mit dem größten Bezug (belegbasiert).

Abgeleitet aus MITRE CTID (Apache-2.0) und dem NIST-800-53-↔-CSF-Crosswalk (gemeinfrei). Eine indikative Relevanz entlang der Protect-/Detect-Achse — keine Compliance-Bewertung und keine Abdeckungsaussage.

06

Mindernde Maßnahmen (3)

Sicherheitskontrollen, die dies mindern.

07

Gruppen (1)

Zugehörige Bedrohungsgruppen.

08

Software (1)

Zugehörige Malware und Tools.

09

Quelle

Wo diese Definition veröffentlicht ist.