T1649 Steal or Forge Authentication Certificates

Enterprise

Adversaries may steal or forge certificates used for authentication to access remote systems or resources. Digital certificates are often used to sign and encrypt messages and/or files. Certificates are also used as authentication material. For example, Entra ID device certificates and Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) certificates bind to an identity and can be used as credentials for domain accounts. Authentication certificates can be both stolen and forged. For example, AD CS certificates can be stolen from encrypted storage (in the Registry or files), misplaced certificate files (i.e. Unsecured Credentials), or directly from the Windows certificate store via various crypto APIs. With appropriate enrollment rights, users and/or machines within a domain can also request and/or manually renew certificates from enterprise certificate authorities (CA). This enrollment process defines various settings and permissions associated with the certificate. Of note, the certificate’s extended key usage (EKU) values define signing, encryption, and authentication use cases, while the certificate’s subject alternative name (SAN) values define the certificate owner’s alternate names. Abusing certificates for authentication credentials may enable other behaviors such as Lateral Movement. Certificate-related misconfigurations may also enable opportunities for Privilege Escalation, by way of allowing users to impersonate or assume privileged accounts or permissions via the identities (SANs) associated with a certificate. These abuses may also enable Persistence via stealing or forging certificates that can be used as Valid Accounts for the duration of the certificate's validity, despite user password resets. Authentication certificates can also be stolen and forged for machine accounts. Adversaries who have access to root (or subordinate) CA certificate private keys (or mechanisms protecting/managing these keys) may also establish Persistence by forging arbitrary authentication certificates for the victim domain (known as “golden” certificates). Adversaries may also target certificates and related services in order to access other forms of credentials, such as Golden Ticket ticket-granting tickets (TGT) or NTLM plaintext.

01

Plattformen

Plattformen, für die dies gilt.

WindowsLinuxmacOSIdentity Provider
02

Taktiken

ATT&CK-Taktiken, denen diese Technik dient.

03

Gegenmaßnahmen

ATT&CK-Gegenmaßnahmen, die dies verringern.

05

Abgewehrt durch (D3FEND)

D3FEND-Gegenmaßnahmen dagegen.

06

NIST CSF 2.0 — Relevanzbereiche (Protect / Detect)

NIST-CSF-2.0-Bereiche mit dem größten Bezug (belegbasiert).

Abgeleitet aus MITRE CTID (Apache-2.0) und dem NIST-800-53-↔-CSF-Crosswalk (gemeinfrei). Eine indikative Relevanz entlang der Protect-/Detect-Achse — keine Compliance-Bewertung und keine Abdeckungsaussage.

07

Mindernde Maßnahmen (3)

Sicherheitskontrollen, die dies mindern.

08

Gruppen (2)

Zugehörige Bedrohungsgruppen.

09

Software (3)

Zugehörige Malware und Tools.

10

Erkannt durch (Sigma) (11)

Zugehörige Sigma-Erkennungsregeln.

11

Quelle

Wo diese Definition veröffentlicht ist.