T1564.006 Run Virtual Instance
Unter-TechnikEnterpriseAdversaries may carry out malicious operations using a virtual instance to avoid detection. A wide variety of virtualization technologies exist that allow for the emulation of a computer or computing environment. By running malicious code inside of a virtual instance, adversaries can hide artifacts associated with their behavior from security tools that are unable to monitor activity inside the virtual instance. Additionally, depending on the virtual networking implementation (ex: bridged adapter), network traffic generated by the virtual instance can be difficult to trace back to the compromised host as the IP address and hostname might not match known values. Adversaries may utilize native support for virtualization (ex: Hyper-V), deploy lightweight emulators (ex: QEMU), or drop the necessary files to run a virtual instance (ex: VirtualBox binaries). After running a virtual instance, adversaries may create a shared folder between the guest and host with permissions that enable the virtual instance to interact with the host file system. Threat actors may also leverage temporary virtualized environments such as the Windows Sandbox, which supports the use of `.wsb` configuration files for defining execution parameters. For example, the `<MappedFolder>` property supports the creation of a shared folder, while the `<LogonCommand>` property allows the specification of a payload. In VMWare environments, adversaries may leverage the vCenter console to create new virtual machines. However, they may also create virtual machines directly on ESXi servers by running a valid `.vmx` file with the `/bin/vmx` utility. Adding this command to `/etc/rc.local.d/local.sh` (i.e., RC Scripts) will cause the VM to persistently restart. Creating a VM this way prevents it from appearing in the vCenter console or in the output to the `vim-cmd vmsvc/getallvms` command on the ESXi server, thereby hiding it from typical administrative activities.
Plattformen
Plattformen, für die dies gilt.
Taktiken
ATT&CK-Taktiken, denen diese Technik dient.
Unter-Technik von
Die übergeordnete Entität.
Gegenmaßnahmen
ATT&CK-Gegenmaßnahmen, die dies verringern.
Erkannt durch (7)
Datenkomponenten, die dies erkennen.
Abgewehrt durch (D3FEND)
D3FEND-Gegenmaßnahmen dagegen.
Model
Detect
Isolate
Deceive
NIST CSF 2.0 — Relevanzbereiche (Protect / Detect)
NIST-CSF-2.0-Bereiche mit dem größten Bezug (belegbasiert).
- PR.PSPlatform Securitystark · gestützt durch 5 von 7 zugeordneten Controls
- DE.CMContinuous Monitoringmoderat · gestützt durch 3 von 7 zugeordneten Controls
- PR.DSData Securitymoderat · gestützt durch 3 von 7 zugeordneten Controls
Abgeleitet aus MITRE CTID (Apache-2.0) und dem NIST-800-53-↔-CSF-Crosswalk (gemeinfrei). Eine indikative Relevanz entlang der Protect-/Detect-Achse — keine Compliance-Bewertung und keine Abdeckungsaussage.
Mindernde Maßnahmen (7)
Sicherheitskontrollen, die dies mindern.
Software (3)
Zugehörige Malware und Tools.
Erkannt durch (Sigma) (2)
Zugehörige Sigma-Erkennungsregeln.
Quelle
Wo diese Definition veröffentlicht ist.