T1221 Template Injection
EnterpriseAdversaries may create or modify references in user document templates to conceal malicious code or force authentication attempts. For example, Microsoft’s Office Open XML (OOXML) specification defines an XML-based format for Office documents (.docx, xlsx,.pptx) to replace older binary formats (.doc,.xls,.ppt). OOXML files are packed together ZIP archives compromised of various XML files, referred to as parts, containing properties that collectively define how a document is rendered. Properties within parts may reference shared public resources accessed via online URLs. For example, template properties may reference a file, serving as a pre-formatted document blueprint, that is fetched when the document is loaded. Adversaries may abuse these templates to initially conceal malicious code to be executed via user documents. Template references injected into a document may enable malicious payloads to be fetched and executed when the document is loaded. These documents can be delivered via other techniques such as Phishing and/or Taint Shared Content and may evade static detections since no typical indicators (VBA macro, script, etc.) are present until after the malicious payload is fetched. Examples have been seen in the wild where template injection was used to load malicious code containing an exploit. Adversaries may also modify the <code>*\template</code> control word within an.rtf file to similarly conceal then download malicious code. This legitimate control word value is intended to be a file destination of a template file resource that is retrieved and loaded when an.rtf file is opened. However, adversaries may alter the bytes of an existing.rtf file to insert a template control word field to include a URL resource of a malicious payload. This technique may also enable Forced Authentication by injecting a SMB/HTTPS (or other credential prompting) URL and triggering an authentication attempt.
Plattformen
Plattformen, für die dies gilt.
Taktiken
ATT&CK-Taktiken, denen diese Technik dient.
Gegenmaßnahmen
ATT&CK-Gegenmaßnahmen, die dies verringern.
Erkannt durch (2)
Datenkomponenten, die dies erkennen.
NIST CSF 2.0 — Relevanzbereiche (Protect / Detect)
NIST-CSF-2.0-Bereiche mit dem größten Bezug (belegbasiert).
- PR.PSPlatform Securitymoderat · gestützt durch 6 von 14 zugeordneten Controls
- DE.CMContinuous Monitoringmoderat · gestützt durch 5 von 14 zugeordneten Controls
- PR.DSData Securitymoderat · gestützt durch 5 von 14 zugeordneten Controls
Abgeleitet aus MITRE CTID (Apache-2.0) und dem NIST-800-53-↔-CSF-Crosswalk (gemeinfrei). Eine indikative Relevanz entlang der Protect-/Detect-Achse — keine Compliance-Bewertung und keine Abdeckungsaussage.
Mindernde Maßnahmen (14)
Sicherheitskontrollen, die dies mindern.
bekannt ausgenutzte CVEs (3)
Zugehörige CVEs.
| ID | Schweregrad | ausnutzbar | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-23692US | critical9.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
Rejetto HTTP File Server, up to and including version 2.3m, is vulnerable to a template injection vulnerability. This vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to exe… | ||||
| CVE-2023-22527US | critical9.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
A template injection vulnerability on older versions of Confluence Data Center and Server allows an unauthenticated attacker to achieve RCE on an affected instance. Customers using… | ||||
| CVE-2022-22954US | critical9.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
VMware Workspace ONE Access and Identity Manager contain a remote code execution vulnerability due to server-side template injection. A malicious actor with network access can trig… | ||||
Angriffsmuster (1)
CAPEC-Angriffsmuster, die dies ausnutzen.
Gruppen (8)
Zugehörige Bedrohungsgruppen.
Software (2)
Zugehörige Malware und Tools.
Kampagnen (2)
Kampagnen, die dies verwenden.
Erkannt durch (Sigma) (2)
Zugehörige Sigma-Erkennungsregeln.
Quelle
Wo diese Definition veröffentlicht ist.