T1133 External Remote Services
EnterpriseAdversaries may leverage external-facing remote services to initially access and/or persist within a network. Remote services such as VPNs, Citrix, and other access mechanisms allow users to connect to internal enterprise network resources from external locations. There are often remote service gateways that manage connections and credential authentication for these services. Services such as Windows Remote Management and VNC can also be used externally. Access to Valid Accounts to use the service is often a requirement, which could be obtained through credential pharming or by obtaining the credentials from users after compromising the enterprise network. Access to remote services may be used as a redundant or persistent access mechanism during an operation. Access may also be gained through an exposed service that doesn’t require authentication. In containerized environments, this may include an exposed Docker API, Kubernetes API server, kubelet, or web application such as the Kubernetes dashboard. Adversaries may also establish persistence on network by configuring a Tor hidden service on a compromised system. Adversaries may utilize the tool `ShadowLink` to facilitate the installation and configuration of the Tor hidden service. Tor hidden service is then accessible via the Tor network because `ShadowLink` sets up a.onion address on the compromised system. `ShadowLink` may be used to forward any inbound connections to RDP, allowing the adversaries to have remote access. Adversaries may get `ShadowLink` to persist on a system by masquerading it as an MS Defender application.
Plattformen
Plattformen, für die dies gilt.
Taktiken
ATT&CK-Taktiken, denen diese Technik dient.
Gegenmaßnahmen
ATT&CK-Gegenmaßnahmen, die dies verringern.
Erkannt durch (5)
Datenkomponenten, die dies erkennen.
Abgewehrt durch (D3FEND)
D3FEND-Gegenmaßnahmen dagegen.
NIST CSF 2.0 — Relevanzbereiche (Protect / Detect)
NIST-CSF-2.0-Bereiche mit dem größten Bezug (belegbasiert).
- PR.AAIdentity Management, Authentication, and Access Controlmoderat · gestützt durch 6 von 17 zugeordneten Controls
- DE.CMContinuous Monitoringmoderat · gestützt durch 5 von 17 zugeordneten Controls
- PR.DSData Securitymoderat · gestützt durch 5 von 17 zugeordneten Controls
Abgeleitet aus MITRE CTID (Apache-2.0) und dem NIST-800-53-↔-CSF-Crosswalk (gemeinfrei). Eine indikative Relevanz entlang der Protect-/Detect-Achse — keine Compliance-Bewertung und keine Abdeckungsaussage.
Mindernde Maßnahmen (17)
Sicherheitskontrollen, die dies mindern.
bekannt ausgenutzte CVEs (25)
Zugehörige CVEs.
| ID | Schweregrad | ausnutzbar | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-32756US | critical9.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiCamera 2.1.0 through 2.1.3, FortiCamera 2.0 all versions, FortiCamera 1.1 all versions, FortiMa… | ||||
| CVE-2024-11120US | critical9.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
Certain EOL GeoVision devices have an OS Command Injection vulnerability. Unauthenticated remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability to inject and execute arbitrary system com… | ||||
| CVE-2024-45195US | high7.5OT kritisch | KEV | ||
Direct Request ('Forced Browsing') vulnerability in Apache OFBiz.
This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.16.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.16, which fi… | ||||
| CVE-2023-48365US | critical9.9OT kritisch | KEV | ||
Qlik Sense Enterprise for Windows before August 2023 Patch 2 allows unauthenticated remote code execution, aka QB-21683. Due to improper validation of HTTP headers, a remote attack… | ||||
| CVE-2023-39780US | high8.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
On ASUS RT-AX55 3.0.0.4.386.51598 devices, authenticated attackers can perform OS command injection via the /start_apply.htm qos_bw_rulelist parameter. NOTE: for the similar "token… | ||||
| CVE-2023-20269US | critical9.1OT kritisch | KEV | ||
A vulnerability in the remote access VPN feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticate… | ||||
| CVE-2023-27532US | high7.5OT kritisch | KEV | ||
Vulnerability in Veeam Backup & Replication component allows encrypted credentials stored in the configuration database to be obtained. This may lead to gaining access to the backu… | ||||
| CVE-2022-20699US | critical9.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate pr… | ||||
| CVE-2021-1498US | critical9.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco HyperFlex HX could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform command injection attacks against an… | ||||
| CVE-2021-1497US | critical9.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco HyperFlex HX could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform command injection attacks against an… | ||||
| CVE-2021-22986US | critical9.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, and 12.1.x before 12.1.5.3 amd BIG-IQ 7.1.0.x before 7.1.0.3 and 7.… | ||||
| CVE-2021-26857US | medium6.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-26855US | high7.5OT kritisch | KEV | ||
Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2020-25506US | critical9.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
D-Link DNS-320 FW v2.06B01 Revision Ax is affected by command injection in the system_mgr.cgi component, which can lead to remote arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1472US | high9.3OT kritisch | KEV | ||
An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when an attacker establishes a vulnerable Netlogon secure channel connection to a domain controller, using the Netlogon Remote Protoc… | ||||
| CVE-2019-5591US | medium6.5OT kritisch | KEV | ||
A Default Configuration vulnerability in FortiOS may allow an unauthenticated attacker on the same subnet to intercept sensitive information by impersonating the LDAP server. | ||||
| CVE-2020-5902US | critical9.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
In BIG-IP versions 15.0.0-15.1.0.3, 14.1.0-14.1.2.5, 13.1.0-13.1.3.3, 12.1.0-12.1.5.1, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.1, the Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI), also referred to as the Co… | ||||
| CVE-2020-8515US | critical9.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
DrayTek Vigor2960 1.3.1_Beta, Vigor3900 1.4.4_Beta, and Vigor300B 1.3.3_Beta, 1.4.2.1_Beta, and 1.4.4_Beta devices allow remote code execution as root (without authentication) via… | ||||
| CVE-2019-19781US | critical9.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
An issue was discovered in Citrix Application Delivery Controller (ADC) and Gateway 10.5, 11.1, 12.0, 12.1, and 13.0. They allow Directory Traversal. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0708US | critical9.8OT kritisch | KEV | ||
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote Desktop Services formerly known as Terminal Services when an unauthenticated attacker connects to the target system using RDP… | ||||
Angriffsmuster (1)
CAPEC-Angriffsmuster, die dies ausnutzen.
Gruppen (28)
Zugehörige Bedrohungsgruppen.
Software (5)
Zugehörige Malware und Tools.
Kampagnen (10)
Kampagnen, die dies verwenden.
Erkannt durch (Sigma) (20)
Zugehörige Sigma-Erkennungsregeln.
Quelle
Wo diese Definition veröffentlicht ist.