DeutschShown in its original language — a full translation is planned for a future version.
Golang Go: Mehrere Schwachstellen
view advisory published 2026-10-08
Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Golang Go ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen, um Informationen offenzulegen, um Daten zu manipulieren und um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.
01
describes (15)
Related CVEs.
| ID | severity | exploitable | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-97032US | — | — | ||
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines w… | ||||
| CVE-2026-97031US | — | — | ||
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server p… | ||||
| CVE-2026-97030US | — | — | ||
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses… | ||||
| CVE-2026-94448US | — | — | ||
When a JavaScript template literal contains consecutive expressions, the context tracking state was not properly reset upon entering a new expression. We now ensure that template-l… | ||||
| CVE-2026-94447US | — | — | ||
Previously, a user operating inside of a malicious Go project that defines a bogus golang.org/toolchain go.sum entry and operates a malicious GOMODPROXY the user chooses to use can… | ||||
| CVE-2026-94444US | — | — | ||
Previously, a user operating inside of a malicious Go project that defines a bogus golang.org/fips140 and operates a malicious GOMODPROXY the user chooses to connect to can serve a… | ||||
| CVE-2026-94440US | — | — | ||
Parsing a multipart form can bypass memory limits and read an arbitrarily long line into memory when the remaining limit at the start of a part is less than 400 bytes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94439US | — | — | ||
When an HTTP server handler sends a 2xx response to an HTTP/1 CONNECT request and returns without hijacking the connection, the server improperly continues to read and serve reques… | ||||
| CVE-2026-78669US | — | — | ||
A malicious HTTP/2 peer can cause excessive CPU consumption in the client or server by opening a large number of streams and then sending many small SETTINGS frames containing SETT… | ||||
| CVE-2026-78667US | — | — | ||
When parsing a Range header containing a large number of small ranges, FileServer(FS), ServeContent, and ServeFile(FS) can consume an excessive amount of CPU. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78663US | — | — | ||
The HTTP/2 server can refund connection-level flow control twice for the same data: Once when a client resets a stream (refunding data for any sent-but-unread portion of the stream… | ||||
| CVE-2026-78660US | — | — | ||
Historically, we have been rather lax about malformed framing-related headers in our HTTP/2 implementation, as they cannot interfere with HTTP/2 framing. However, this makes it pos… | ||||
| CVE-2026-78659US | — | — | ||
When "Trailer" headers are sent by a client, the HTTP server internally uses the header values to populate the Request.Trailer map passed to the server handler. Because Request.Tra… | ||||
| CVE-2026-56866US | — | — | ||
When http.Transport sends an HTTP/1 CONNECT request with a non-empty Request.Body, it writes the body directly to the connection without framing after the request headers. If the s… | ||||
| CVE-2026-56857US | — | — | ||
On Windows, when the target of Root.Mkdir or Root.MkdirAll is a junction pointing to an empty location, the operation can create a directory at the junction target even when that t… | ||||
02
references
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- Oracle Linux Security Advisory ELSA-2026-86203 vom 2026-10-23external
- Oracle Linux Security Advisory ELSA-2026-89732 vom 2026-10-27external
- Oracle Linux Security Advisory ELSA-2026-89744 vom 2026-10-27external
- Oracle Linux Security Advisory ELSA-2026-89752 vom 2026-10-27external
- Oracle Linux Security Advisory ELSA-2026-89761 vom 2026-10-27external
- Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2026:79715 vom 2026-10-09external
- Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2026:79720 vom 2026-10-10external
- Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2026:86093 vom 2026-10-21external
scry
Advisories like this name the exposed products attackers go after on your perimeter. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan