DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model. pkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.
01
describes (1)
Related CVEs.
| ID | severity | exploitable | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-3479US | — | — | ||
DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to c… | ||||
02
references
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5af6ce3e7b643a30a02d22245c1e3f4a8bc0a1feFIX
- https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/bcdf231946b1da8bdfbab4c05539bb0cc964a1c7FIX
- https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/cf59bf76470f3d75ad47d80ffb8ce76b64b5e943FIX
- https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d786d59a8f7196bb630100a869f28ad13436b59cFIX
- https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/146121REPORT
- https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/146122WEB
- https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/WYLLVQOOCKGK73JM7Z7ZSNOJC4N7BAWY/ADVISORY
scry
Advisories like this name the exposed products attackers go after on your perimeter. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan