GHSA-pwhc-rpq9-4c8w

containerd affected by a local privilege escalation via wide permissions on CRI directory

### Impact An overly broad default permission vulnerability was found in containerd. - `/var/lib/containerd` was created with the permission bits 0o711, while it should be created with 0o700 - Allowed local users on the host to potentially access the metadata store and the content store - `/run/containerd/io.containerd.grpc.v1.cri` was created with 0o755, while it should be created with 0o700 - Allowed local users on the host to potentially access the contents of Kubernetes local volumes. The contents of volumes might include setuid binaries, which could allow a local user on the host to elevate privileges on the host. - `/run/containerd/io.containerd.sandbox.controller.v1.shim` was created with 0o711, while it should be created with 0o700 The directory paths may differ depending on the daemon configuration. When the `temp` directory path is specified in the daemon configuration, that directory was also created with 0o711, while it should be created with 0o700. ### Patches This bug has been fixed in the following containerd versions: * 2.2.0 * 2.1.5 * 2.0.7 * 1.7.29 Users should update to these versions to resolve the issue. These updates automatically change the permissions of the existing directories. > [!NOTE] > > `/run/containerd` and `/run/containerd/io.containerd.runtime.v2.task` are still created with 0o711. > This is an expected behavior for supporting userns-remapped containers. ### Workarounds The system administrator on the host can manually chmod the directories to not have group or world accessible permisisons: ``` chmod 700 /var/lib/containerd chmod 700 /run/containerd/io.containerd.grpc.v1.cri chmod 700 /run/containerd/io.containerd.sandbox.controller.v1.shim ``` An alternative mitigation would be to run containerd in [rootless mode](https://github.com/containerd/containerd/blob/main/docs/rootless.md). ### Credits The containerd project would like to thank David Leadbeater for responsibly disclosing this issue in accordance with the [containerd security policy](https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/main/SECURITY.md). ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in [containerd](https://github.com/containerd/containerd/issues/new/choose) * Email us at [security@containerd.io](mailto:security@containerd.io) To report a security issue in containerd: * [Report a new vulnerability](https://github.com/containerd/containerd/security/advisories/new)