Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulnerable to such attacks themselves. However, third-party code that uses node's ambiguous presentation of certificate subjects may be vulnerable.
describes (1)
Related CVEs.
| ID | severity | exploitable | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-44533US | medium5.3 | — | ||
Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a sin… | ||||
references
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694ADVISORY
- https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/jan-2022-security-releases/ADVISORY
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44533WEB
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220325-0007/ADVISORY
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5170ADVISORY
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.htmlADVISORY
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.htmlADVISORY
Advisories like this name the exposed products attackers go after on your perimeter. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan