DeutschShown in its original language — a full translation is planned for a future version.
Mehrere Webserver: Schwachstelle ermöglicht Umgehen von Sicherheitsvorkehrungen
view advisory published 2016-07-18
Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in mehreren Webserver Produkten ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.
01
describes (11)
Related CVEs.
| ID | severity | exploitable | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-1000111US | medium5.3 | — | ||
Twisted before 16.3.1 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect CGI applications from the presence of untrusted client… | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000109US | medium5.3 | — | ||
HHVM does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect CGI applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_… | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000105US | — | — | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue.… | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000107US | medium6.1 | — | ||
inets in Erlang possibly 22.1 and earlier follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY e… | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000108US | medium6.1 | — | ||
yaws before 2.0.4 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect CGI applications from the presence of untrusted client data… | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000104US | high8.8 | — | ||
A security Bypass vulnerability exists in the FcgidPassHeader Proxy in mod_fcgid through 2016-07-07. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000110US | medium6.1 | — | ||
The CGIHandler class in Python before 2.7.12 does not protect against the HTTP_PROXY variable name clash in a CGI script, which could allow a remote attacker to redirect HTTP reque… | ||||
| CVE-2016-5388US | high8.1 | — | ||
Apache Tomcat 7.x through 7.0.70 and 8.x through 8.5.4, when the CGI Servlet is enabled, follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presen… | ||||
| CVE-2016-5387US | high8.1 | — | ||
The Apache HTTP Server through 2.4.23 follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY envir… | ||||
| CVE-2016-5386US | high8.1 | — | ||
The net/http package in Go through 1.6 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect CGI applications from the presence of… | ||||
| CVE-2016-5385US | high8.1 | — | ||
PHP through 7.0.8 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in… | ||||
02
references
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- Eintrag auf Apache.orgexternal
- Oracle Linux Security Advisory ELSA-2016-2586 vom 2016-11-09external
- Oracle Linux Security Advisory ELSA-2016-2598 vom 2016-11-09external
- SUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2016:2090 vom 2016-08-17external
- SUSE Security Update SUSE-SU-2016:2106-1 vom 2016-08-19external
- CentOS Announce CESA-2016:1422 vom 2016-07-18external
- CentOS Announce CESA-2016:1421 vom 2016-07-18external
- Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2016:1626-1 vom 2016-08-18external
scry
Advisories like this name the exposed products attackers go after on your perimeter. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan